Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 11
02-13-2010, 08:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maldelver View Post
tactical specced players MUST skill up escort to get full effect of spec abilities
I stopped reading here.
There are Tac, Sci, and Eng classes. There are Tac, Sci, and Eng (essectially) based ships.
You were expecting what? Cause the way it is now looks logical to me. If you go Tac, you gotta RUN Tac to get the most of BEING Tac.
Whats so hard about that?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 12
02-13-2010, 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great_Milenko
I stopped reading here.
There are Tac, Sci, and Eng classes. There are Tac, Sci, and Eng (essectially) based ships.
You were expecting what? Cause the way it is now looks logical to me. If you go Tac, you gotta RUN Tac to get the most of BEING Tac.
Whats so hard about that?
No class is pigeon holed into a specific ship EXCEPT the Tac officer. The ships we choose are what our classes are as much as what we chose in character creation. Since this is the case one spec should not HAVE to spec into a ship to get full value out of its skills. This affects klingons more as our escorts are usually not preferable to a BoP for DPS.

It does bother me though that someone would trash a whole thought out thread based on disagreeing with one line of it. Thats what I would calla forum troll IMO
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 13
02-13-2010, 08:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maldelver View Post
No class is pigeon holed into a specific ship EXCEPT the Tac officer. The ships we choose are what our classes are as much as what we chose in character creation. Since this is the case one spec should not HAVE to spec into a ship to get full value out of its skills. This affects klingons more as our escorts are usually not preferable to a BoP for DPS.

It does bother me though that someone would trash a whole thought out thread based on disagreeing with one line of it. Thats what I would calla forum troll IMO
IM a troll cause I like the system? lol
That lable gets thrown arount far too easily on this forum
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 14
02-13-2010, 09:03 PM
The server issues have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with bandwidth. At all. Not even a little.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 15
02-13-2010, 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by QLanatir
i can agree with quite some points you wrote there, even tho i would take it easier a bit. but this thing:

no end game pvp territory gain or loss war content and nothing suggesting there will be any

brought me up against you. That is the one thing i dont wanna see. PvP should be optional and absolutely avoidable.
you can have this, and still have it be optional
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 16
02-13-2010, 09:41 PM
"Space combat is not a full x/y/z 360 model"

Niether is any ship in star trek duh. how many ships did you see flying straight up and down is star trek?... not many.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 17
02-13-2010, 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great_Milenko
IM a troll cause I like the system? lol
That lable gets thrown arount far too easily on this forum
No your a troll based on your comment of... I stopped reading here...


That is a troll comment.


And you might like the game but that has nothing to with my thread. Like or dislike my points are valid
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 18
02-13-2010, 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by erichamby View Post
"Space combat is not a full x/y/z 360 model"

Niether is any ship in star trek duh. how many ships did you see flying straight up and down is star trek?... not many.
Star Trek VI...
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 19
02-13-2010, 09:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maldelver View Post
No your a troll based on your comment of... I stopped reading here...


That is a troll comment.


And you might like the game but that has nothing to with my thread. Like or dislike my points are valid
Ah, I see, YOU are the troll then. You had it backwards. Or thats what I call the ppl that come here just to trash the game. Especially if liking the game has nothing to do with your thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by erichamby View Post
"Space combat is not a full x/y/z 360 model"

Niether is any ship in star trek duh. how many ships did you see flying straight up and down is star trek?... not many.
NO! Dont do it... that one guy that had a billion links showing exactly this might come back :p
Ugh I went looking for the post but its buried in the archives in a thread thats 65 pages deep an even IM not that committed
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 20
02-13-2010, 10:01 PM
You have some points, but you are dead wrong about the missions. Are you even reading them? Because there are a LOT that are just awesome.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:32 AM.