Go Back   Star Trek Online > Information and Discussion > Star Trek Online General Discussion
Login

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 21
02-18-2010, 09:05 AM
A lots of these reviews have nailed all of the issues we are experiencing.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 22
02-18-2010, 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirai View Post
Gamespy reviews STO.

It seems slightly too harsh to me. I'd give the game a 3/5 instead of a 2/5. Still, the criticisms are the same sort of things that we've seen around the forums and in other reviews. The cryptic (pun intended) skill tree gets understandably poor marks, but I don't share the reviewer's low opinion of the space and ground combat systems.
A spot on review. I sure hope Cryptic is readling it and making plans.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirai View Post
Still, the criticisms are the same sort of things that we've seen around the forums and in other reviews.
Wait... you mean the "haters" are right?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 23
02-18-2010, 09:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord.Funk
They are entitled to their opinions. You are entitled to Your opinions as i am entitled to mine. Simple as that. If we agree or not is another question and really not important. Lets say we can agree to disagree and think no less of each other for it.


I agree, the only review, I trust is my own, allot of these people that write reviews are not gamers, so I could care less, what any reviews say good or bad, as long as I am having fun, thats all I care about,,
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 24
02-18-2010, 09:18 AM
I actually gage the game success by the in-game chatter. Most of its favorable. However, the reviewer made some good points. But they are aren't anything new..you can find the same points made by forum posters. I'm actually wondering if he didn't pull some of his opinions off the forums.

Things I agree with though...

- The game is beautifully rendered.
- The character generator is top notch, if not down right innovative
- The game has some spectacular moments that really deliver.

What can be better...

- Some of the content is a bit "off".
- Way to many typos and in game errors.
- Game play needs improvement.


That being said I'm convinced we will see improvements pretty quickly. I don't think anyone at Cryptic is ignoring us or cutting and running. If anything they're frantically trying to figure out the best and most efficient course of action. This game is a big deal for them. Remember that Champions was supposed to be "Marvel Online" and the deal fell through. Cryptic needs a big win and they know that. It's just logical .
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 25
02-18-2010, 09:19 AM
Not harsh but accurate. I am hopiing of course that it will improve with time and as someone in my fllet said ..It's a diamond in the rough. I have brought 6 months and I will give it the full 6 months to improve or it will go out the door the way Wow did for me last summer. There are only a certain number of times you can do the same missions before mind numbing boredom sets in.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 26
02-18-2010, 09:21 AM
well it's the lowest review by far, at least 20% lower score than the others.

Did Cryptic forget to bribe Gamespy with exclusives or something? They don't have to do anything to win the 'most improved mmo of 2011' now...

I mean I can understand frustration, but I wouldn't throw this game in the same category as 'redneck deer hunter 2009'...
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 27
02-18-2010, 09:51 AM
Gamespy has been rough on Cryptic since Champions Online. They gave a lot of great previews for Champions Online and even devoted a week to presenting gameplay. Then during "open" Beta, Gamespy hosted the filesite to download the Beta files and it ended up a disaster. You still had to download a lot of content from Cryptics very slow servers and it took a day or 2 to download the game. After that point, Gamespy became very highly critical of Champions Online. There was a reviewer did an out of the box review. Iit a very harsh preview that was filled with lots of jabs at the game and very little factual information. Then the final review came out and it was very harsh too. It gave a bit of better information but it still seemed like the reviewer had an axe to grind.

If anyone noticed, Gamespy was suppose to have a bunch of Star Trek Online preview stuff too. It was very slow coming. They did give it a lot of favorable remarks though in their previews.

It was of no surprise that STO received such a poor score from Gamespy. I am enjoying the game because I like the character creation, advancement of my Bridge Officers, and decking out my starship. I haven't played any MMOs that have had this customization from the beginning.

Also look at ****'s review on Gamespy. They gave that borefest/Wowclone a 3 1/2 stars. **** could have been a great game but it is one of the most derivative games out there.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 28
02-18-2010, 09:58 AM
Deer God...

Quote:
Originally Posted by God-Emperor
I mean I can understand frustration, but I wouldn't throw this game in the same category as 'redneck deer hunter 2009'...
RDH09 is the Best. Game. Ever.

No one else has done so much to position the deer-hunting genre squarely in the mainstream.

Do not speak ill of the redneck deer hunter. Nay nay. Celebrate his tremendous success in bringing the primal passions of every gamer to the forefront and legitimizing pure, unadulterated, uber pwnidge of cute, defenseless critters for the masses.

The next time you stalk a simulated animal in an online game, remember you stand on the shoulders of giants. Redneck giants. Redneck, deer-hunting giants.

God Bless America. Amen.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 29
02-18-2010, 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kirrana
Of course they gave it a poor review. When was the last time you saw a game that was a non Blizzard one they did give a good review for.


They ran a Comic Strip / Advert for WOW for 5 years and every 3rd story they run on the site is a Blizzard one
Exactly. Game review sites , and game reviewers, are nothing more than corporate tools to steer the sheeple. Usually takes little investigating to find out who pulls their strings.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
# 30
02-18-2010, 10:13 AM
seemed like a fair review to me..
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:31 AM.