Quote:
Originally Posted by Hebi-Kumo
Ya, see you expected Gold. You think that MMOs come out of the box ready to go with no issues. How many times do people have to say that even other MMOs started off with a lot of negative feedback.
|
I just don't understand this - at all.
The poster you were responding to did not expect gold.
Every single one of their statements were absolutely correct - and entirely reasonable. They didn't expect gold. They expected something decent - as promised by Cryptic's own marketing and advertising, something which Cryptic didn't deliver.
Both the game and the "story writing" lack content, depth, inventiveness, intelligence, variety, and any sense of
Star Trek. Controls are clunky, powers spottily defined, missions repetitive, gameplay shallow, stories hollow, and the progress through the extremely limited content doesn't last more than a week or two of playing.
I'm sure you'll come back and tell me that I'm wrong, and how wonderful the game is (and if you truly think it's a great game, that's your opinion and I'm actually glad you're enjoying it), and that all the other MMOs out there had the same problems (which isn't true. They at least had content to last more than a week or two at launch) - but consider this when STO gets compared to WoW (which is the most frequent comparison):
WoW came out five years ago. If there have been
no advances in technology since then, then this would be a valid comparison. But technology has advanced by leaps and bounds since then - making the "WoW was like this" argument essentially moot.
Cryptic launched "City of Heroes" six years ago. If Cryptic are unable to learn not only from the past history of the MMO genre but also from
their own previous MMO experience, are able to release two MMOs prior to the launch of STO without showing any kind of improvement over what's come from years past, what are they doing in the MMO business to begin with?
So please, while forming your response, give a few minutes to consider the parameters of your comparisons. A correlation between something three weeks old and something five years old is invalid.