Maybe I'm naturally oversensitive, or maybe someone just slipped me decaf coffee this morning, but CRYPTIC FANBOIS's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. It is worth noting at the outset that the biggest difference between me and CRYPTIC FANBOIS is that CRYPTIC FANBOIS wants to increase people's stress and aggression. I, on the other hand, want to condemn—without hesitation, without remorse—all those who destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate. If CRYPTIC FANBOIS's plan to peddle the snake oil of doctrinaire antagonism is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to restore our righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail over CRYPTIC FANBOIS's stinking Praetorian Guard. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that the problem with it is not that it's negligent. It's that it wants to make its smears a key dynamic in modern larrikinism by viscerally defining "epididymodeferentectomy" through the experience of avaricious sectarianism. Instead of friends, CRYPTIC FANBOIS has victims and confreres who end up as victims. I certainly feel sorry for the lot of them. I also feel that CRYPTIC FANBOIS claims that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. I respond that I find its demeanor and pomposity downright appalling.
Conventional wisdom states that CRYPTIC FANBOIS's hidebound tirades are as unpleasant as the sewage that gets belched up from a broken garbage disposal in the kitchen sink. I always catch holy hell whenever I say something like that so let me assure you that if you ever ask it to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. Because CRYPTIC FANBOIS wasn't listening when I said this before, I'm forced to repeat myself: CRYPTIC FANBOIS's true goal is to promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush. All the statements that its drones make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to put CRYPTIC FANBOIS's morally crippled contrivances to the question. CRYPTIC FANBOIS accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does it allege I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept its claim that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be.
Clericalism can be deadly but CRYPTIC FANBOIS's scare tactics are much worse. When CRYPTIC FANBOIS says that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. What's the best way to defy CRYPTIC FANBOIS? That's actually a tough nut to crack. The answer is related the way that we are at war. Don't think we're not just because you're not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We're at war with CRYPTIC FANBOIS's maledicent homilies. We're at war with its ignominious mind games. And we're at war with its backwards offhand remarks. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that CRYPTIC FANBOIS is an enemy to its friends and a friend to its enemies. (Yes, my concern is with morality itself, not with the teleological foundations upon which it rests, but that's a different story.)
In other words, CRYPTIC FANBOIS is just trying to pick a fight. That's why it says that its juvenile peuplade is a respected civil-rights organization. CRYPTIC FANBOIS is trying to hide the fact that the path down which it wants to lead us is empty and bleak. Nevertheless, one thing that rings true with crystalline clarity is that it strikes me as amusing that CRYPTIC FANBOIS complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain.
CRYPTIC FANBOIS drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes it sound smarter than it really is and obscures the fact that as CRYPTIC FANBOIS matures morally it'll eventually grow out of its present way of thinking and come to realize that if it gets its way, none of us will be able to spread the word about CRYPTIC FANBOIS's foul allegations to our friends, our neighbors, our relatives, our co-workers—even to strangers. Therefore, we must not let it destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. If CRYPTIC FANBOIS ever claims that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones, we must answer only one thing: "No, the reverse is true." If it is not yet clear that thanks to CRYPTIC FANBOIS, our national and individual sovereignty is fluttering precariously in the wind, then consider that it is a bad egg. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that you shouldn't take threats made by the worst types of beer-guzzling carpers there are too seriously. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. To recap the main points made in this letter: 1) we must bear this bitter truth coolly and soberly in mind, 2) no reasonable person would deny that any effort to negotiate with CRYPTIC FANBOIS or appease it is akin to spitting into a hurricane to quiet its fury, and 3) CRYPTIC FANBOIS's shell games are so impetuous, so bad-tempered, so grotty that there are really no earth words to describe exactly how I feel about them.
There are some comments I need to make regarding CRYPTIC FANBOIS. The key point of the following exposition is that the one thing that's central to all of CRYPTIC FANBOIS's intolerant refrains is a desire to lead an active disinformation campaign. I call this the New Terrorism. The old terrorism was concerned only with turning champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine loose against us good citizens. Although that was bad enough, CRYPTIC FANBOIS's codices are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that going through the motions of working is the same as working and they promote the mistaken idea that representative government is an outmoded system that should be replaced by a system of overt sexism. If you've read any of the quarrelsome slop that CRYPTIC FANBOIS has concocted, you'll sincerely recall CRYPTIC FANBOIS's description of its plan to inspire a recrudescence of nettlesome fatuity. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that if CRYPTIC FANBOIS truly believes that the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids, then maybe it should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.
When people see hostile prevaricators behaving like hostile prevaricators they begin to realize that CRYPTIC FANBOIS says that black is white and night is day. What it means by this, of course, is that it wants free reign to shake belief in all existing institutions through the systematic perversion of both contemporary and historical facts. Of course, if I may be so bold, many people are shocked when I tell them that both irrationalism and authoritarianism are forerunners of CRYPTIC FANBOIS's asinine recommendations. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that by brainwashing its proxies with obstructionism, CRYPTIC FANBOIS makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave. Thanks to CRYPTIC FANBOIS, the epidemic of Bulverism is spreading rapidly, period. Take, as an example, the way that CRYPTIC FANBOIS wants to prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries. Well, when it repeated over and over the rumor that it's a moral exemplar, its dupes, never too difficult to fool, swallowed it. I mean, think about it.
If nothing else, CRYPTIC FANBOIS wants to reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. Why it wants that, I don't know, but that's what it wants. CRYPTIC FANBOIS asserts that it is its moral imperative to plant the seeds of favoritism into the tabulae rasae of children's minds. That assertion is not only untrue but a conscious lie.
It is not news that the people CRYPTIC FANBOIS attacks deserve compassion, not insults, put-downs, or stereotypes. What speaks volumes, though, is that there are three fairly obvious problems with its exegeses, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to challenge its claims of exceptionalism. First, it's a stupid person's idea of a clever organization. Second, it carries the seeds of its own self-destruction. And third, it has been repeating its lies so often and so loudly that they're beginning to drown out the truth. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.
I don't need to tell you that CRYPTIC FANBOIS's flimflams are built on a backlash fueled by anger—in the form of resentment, spite, vengeance, envy, loss, and bitterness over declining status—on the part of crazy buffoons. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that inerudite and headstrong, CRYPTIC FANBOIS's dissertations resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that I cannot promise not to be angry at CRYPTIC FANBOIS. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me—as it leads CRYPTIC FANBOIS—to call for ritualistic invocations of needlessly formal rules. Now that you've read this letter, let me challenge you, the reader, not just to help me give our young people the values that will inspire them to put to rest particularism-oriented and egocentric morals such as CRYPTIC FANBOIS's, but also to educate others about what I've written.
Someone needs to breath in, breath out, breath in and breath out.
Don't forget the chill pills.
I realize that everyone is entitled to his opinion, and I respect this. I also hope that you will all respect mine as you read this letter. If you disagree with my claim that the primary weapons of CRYPTIC FANBOIS's pharisaical, vile chums are lies and deception, then read no further.
Now, I hope CRYPTIC FANBOIS was joking when it implied it was going to oppress, segregate, and punish others, but it sure didn't sound like it. To waste taxpayers' money has never been something that I wanted to do. Never. When asked to mend its ways, CRYPTIC FANBOIS will give people a wink and a smile, but when the wheels begin to turn, it's business as usual. A central fault line runs through each of CRYPTIC FANBOIS's epithets. Specifically, CRYPTIC FANBOIS is currently limited to shrieking and spitting when it's confronted with inconvenient facts. Eventually, however, CRYPTIC FANBOIS is likely to switch to some sort of "undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education" approach to draw our attention away from such facts.
Will someone please explain to me what it is in our lives that can possibly make someone regulate unilateralism? Because I certainly have no idea. If you think you can escape from CRYPTIC FANBOIS's viperine vaporings, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Frowzy conspiracy theorists like it, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in pigheaded pickpockets in order to convince them to open new avenues for the expression of hate.
The success of CRYPTIC FANBOIS's "compromises" relies upon the average voter not knowing whether our nation has gone communist, socialist, fascist, or merely insane. In view of that, it is not surprising that when I hear CRYPTIC FANBOIS's devotees parrot the party line—that totalitarianism forms the core of any utopian society—I see them not as people but as machines. The appropriate noises are coming out of their larynges, but their brains are not involved as they would be if they were thinking about how CRYPTIC FANBOIS's posse appears to be growing in number. I undoubtedly pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction, yet I keep reminding myself that CRYPTIC FANBOIS's perspective is that vandalism brings one closer to nirvana. My perspective, in contrast, is that a true enemy is better than a false friend. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does CRYPTIC FANBOIS aver that it has answers to everything? I've never really gotten a clear and honest answer to that question from CRYPTIC FANBOIS. But what is clear is that it uses big words like "semiprofessionalized" to make itself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although CRYPTIC FANBOIS's causeries may reek like a skunk, CRYPTIC FANBOIS's offhand remarks are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that CRYPTIC FANBOIS's ridiculous, gloomy coterie is a benign and charitable agency and they promote the mistaken idea that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is.
Since I have promised to be candid, I will tell you candidly that CRYPTIC FANBOIS likes rantings that treat people like what I call temperamental tricksters. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that it plans to mete out harsh and arbitrary punishment against its adversaries until they're intimidated into a benumbed, neutralized, impotent, and non-functioning mass. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how seeing CRYPTIC FANBOIS use our weaknesses to its advantage is a nauseating and disgusting spectacle. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding CRYPTIC FANBOIS's promotion of corporatism. Tell everyone you know that it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to ensure that it receives its just deserts. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader. In short, CRYPTIC FANBOIS's writings are a treasure trove of ad hominem attacks, tasteless accusations, and biased reporting from an ophidian point of view. What you really need to do to be convinced of that, however, is to study the matter for yourself. I'll be happy to send you enough facts to get you started. Just write to me
Your nationalistic regurgitation reminds me of militant brain washing. I'd hate to hear what you think of other religions lol, but then again I only red the first couple sentences.
There are some comments I need to make regarding Makadelik. First and foremost, Makadelik's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are its promises. In fact, Makadelik's policies promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Makadelik's worshippers because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Makadelik. People tell me that the wisdom that comes from maturation of the spirit, mind, and body will some day prevail over the idiocy of Makadelik's sophistries. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. I welcome Makadelik's comments. However, Makadelik needs to realize that I like to say that it uses deception to trick people into voting against things that they in fact support. Makadelik never directly acknowledges such truisms but instead tries to turn them around to make it sound like I'm saying that it can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that it considers raffish or impudent. I guess that version better fits its style—or should I say, "agenda"? Let me end by appealing to our collective sense of humanity: Makadelik has a vested interest in making me get fired from my job.