Maybe I'm naturally oversensitive, or maybe someone just slipped me decaf coffee this morning, but CRYPTIC FANBOIS's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. It is worth noting at the outset that the biggest difference between me and CRYPTIC FANBOIS is that CRYPTIC FANBOIS wants to increase people's stress and aggression. I, on the other hand, want to condemn—without hesitation, without remorse—all those who destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate. If CRYPTIC FANBOIS's plan to peddle the snake oil of doctrinaire antagonism is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to restore our righteous rage and singular purpose to prevail over CRYPTIC FANBOIS's stinking Praetorian Guard. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that the problem with it is not that it's negligent. It's that it wants to make its smears a key dynamic in modern larrikinism by viscerally defining "epididymodeferentectomy" through the experience of avaricious sectarianism. Instead of friends, CRYPTIC FANBOIS has victims and confreres who end up as victims. I certainly feel sorry for the lot of them. I also feel that CRYPTIC FANBOIS claims that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. I respond that I find its demeanor and pomposity downright appalling.
Conventional wisdom states that CRYPTIC FANBOIS's hidebound tirades are as unpleasant as the sewage that gets belched up from a broken garbage disposal in the kitchen sink. I always catch holy hell whenever I say something like that so let me assure you that if you ever ask it to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. Because CRYPTIC FANBOIS wasn't listening when I said this before, I'm forced to repeat myself: CRYPTIC FANBOIS's true goal is to promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush. All the statements that its drones make to justify or downplay that goal are only apologetics; they do nothing to put CRYPTIC FANBOIS's morally crippled contrivances to the question. CRYPTIC FANBOIS accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does it allege I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept its claim that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be.
Clericalism can be deadly but CRYPTIC FANBOIS's scare tactics are much worse. When CRYPTIC FANBOIS says that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. What's the best way to defy CRYPTIC FANBOIS? That's actually a tough nut to crack. The answer is related the way that we are at war. Don't think we're not just because you're not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We're at war with CRYPTIC FANBOIS's maledicent homilies. We're at war with its ignominious mind games. And we're at war with its backwards offhand remarks. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that CRYPTIC FANBOIS is an enemy to its friends and a friend to its enemies. (Yes, my concern is with morality itself, not with the teleological foundations upon which it rests, but that's a different story.)
In other words, CRYPTIC FANBOIS is just trying to pick a fight. That's why it says that its juvenile peuplade is a respected civil-rights organization. CRYPTIC FANBOIS is trying to hide the fact that the path down which it wants to lead us is empty and bleak. Nevertheless, one thing that rings true with crystalline clarity is that it strikes me as amusing that CRYPTIC FANBOIS complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! It does nothing but complain.
CRYPTIC FANBOIS drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes it sound smarter than it really is and obscures the fact that as CRYPTIC FANBOIS matures morally it'll eventually grow out of its present way of thinking and come to realize that if it gets its way, none of us will be able to spread the word about CRYPTIC FANBOIS's foul allegations to our friends, our neighbors, our relatives, our co-workers—even to strangers. Therefore, we must not let it destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. If CRYPTIC FANBOIS ever claims that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones, we must answer only one thing: "No, the reverse is true." If it is not yet clear that thanks to CRYPTIC FANBOIS, our national and individual sovereignty is fluttering precariously in the wind, then consider that it is a bad egg. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that you shouldn't take threats made by the worst types of beer-guzzling carpers there are too seriously. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. To recap the main points made in this letter: 1) we must bear this bitter truth coolly and soberly in mind, 2) no reasonable person would deny that any effort to negotiate with CRYPTIC FANBOIS or appease it is akin to spitting into a hurricane to quiet its fury, and 3) CRYPTIC FANBOIS's shell games are so impetuous, so bad-tempered, so grotty that there are really no earth words to describe exactly how I feel about them.
I sincerely hope you don't own any automatic weapons and live near a school.
"A few words about people who hate everything no matter what, yes I'm talking about you."
The purpose of this letter is to outline a plan to seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by Valve1138's vaporings might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational. Permit me this forum to rant. Every time Valve1138 gets caught trying to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue, it promises it'll never do so again. Subsequently, its henchmen always jump in and explain that it really shouldn't be blamed even if it does because, as they contend, the Earth is flat. I see how important Valve1138's wild undertakings are to its hangers-on and I laugh. I laugh because it has repeatedly threatened to spread disloyal views. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because Valve1138 likes to besmirch the memory of some genuine historic figures. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Valve1138 and its sympathizers will run for cover like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must remove the misunderstanding that Valve1138 has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world. This letter should be regarded as the beginning, not the end, of my stance against Valve1138. And that's all I have to say.
I am. and it's "Mr. BAD BAD CEREALKILLER" thank you
Slackjaw is butthurt since I plan to toss this waste of forum space he calls a thread ... into the garbage.
Let me begin this letter with a few simple statements of fact. First fact: Forbearance and kindly deportment are lost upon VERY BAD BAD BAD CerealKillerSD. Second fact: VERY BAD BAD BAD CerealKillerSD's agendas are worthy of a good flush down the toilet. Third fact: VERY BAD BAD BAD CerealKillerSD's co-conspirators amount to nothing more than stolid meanies riding on the back of a social fungus attacking the body politic. These three facts bear repeating over and over again. They are simple and self-evident, but it is easy to forget them in the blizzard of lies and obfuscation coming from VERY BAD BAD BAD CerealKillerSD and its secret police these days. If you disagree with my claim that you should never be impressed by positions or titles but only by honorable deeds, then read no further. VERY BAD BAD BAD CerealKillerSD is known for fabricating evidence. May we never forget this if we are to deny VERY BAD BAD BAD CerealKillerSD and its forces a chance to embark on wholesale torture and slaughter of innocent civilians.