Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1531
11-17-2011, 05:14 PM
Indeed. A lot of the canon inconsistencies could also be culled from the list, as they're either pointless or not beefy enough to provoke a Cryptic response.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1532
11-17-2011, 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Jes-
Indeed. A lot of the canon inconsistencies could also be culled from the list, as they're either pointless or not beefy enough to provoke a Cryptic response.
Thanks for the input jes. ^.^ I've given a lot of the canon inconsistencies the chop, leaving only the big iconic hero ships like the Constitutions, Galaxy, Intrepid, Defiant and Sovereign (and Akira, cause it's awesome. :3 )
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1533
11-18-2011, 01:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cpt_Richardson View Post
Has anyone bothered to poke Logan about the new skin for the Intrepids being horribroke when combining the old pylons with it? I mean, 'holy carp on a dorf, that's broke' bad.
The damned thing's been fixed already on F2P tribble. So I don't believe CapnLogan is the issue.
It's Cryptic including the existing fix in a patch to holodeck, which I believe is someone else entirely.

CapnLogan may be able to pass the message on to the appropriate party, but I wanted to make the distinction that I believe he's already done the work to fix it.

It really burns my muffins that this fix, (which has been on tribble for a couple of weeks already, never made it to the holodeck, where we actually had to pay real money to play with it!
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1534
11-18-2011, 08:37 AM
Does anyone know if there has been any improvements to the fed cruisers e.g. sovereign class? I know the venture and etc but what about ther other ships?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1535
12-01-2011, 10:33 PM
Don't know if this has been mentioned before or it's just my pc but the UFP logo on the Exeter class is bright red. Maybe if Logan scans through this, he can add it to his list.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1536
12-06-2011, 12:34 AM
I've got a feeling that correcting canon inconsistencies of most of the classes is pretty darn low on Cryptic's list of priorities...

Understandable, since it doesn't make them a penny. I'm just dying to see the Galaxy's neck get fixed, along with the other minor details and the arboretum windows that were promised at one point.

By the way, in case you've not seen it, check out Star Trek Excalibur's rendering of the Galaxy. Gob-smackingly good! I can't wait until that game is finally released.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Kkh7c96RVE
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1537
12-06-2011, 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcW
I've got a feeling that correcting canon inconsistencies of most of the classes is pretty darn low on Cryptic's list of priorities...

Understandable, since it doesn't make them a penny. I'm just dying to see the Galaxy's neck get fixed, along with the other minor details and the arboretum windows that were promised at one point.

By the way, in case you've not seen it, check out Star Trek Excalibur's rendering of the Galaxy. Gob-smackingly good! I can't wait until that game is finally released.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Kkh7c96RVE
Good old bridge commander love that game. I hope they will make another game like BC.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1538
12-06-2011, 06:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcW
I've got a feeling that correcting canon inconsistencies of most of the classes is pretty darn low on Cryptic's list of priorities...

Understandable, since it doesn't make them a penny. I'm just dying to see the Galaxy's neck get fixed, along with the other minor details and the arboretum windows that were promised at one point.

By the way, in case you've not seen it, check out Star Trek Excalibur's rendering of the Galaxy. Gob-smackingly good! I can't wait until that game is finally released.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Kkh7c96RVE
thanks for the video. That is 1 accurate Galaxy. I really wish all of STO's ships were that good... seriously. Just compare the 2 ships, the difference is clear. that 1 on u tube seems much more finely-crafted. I also think the starbase looks a bit more like the ones in the series/movies.

Oh well, perhaps someday STO will get the ship models fixed. It can't be that hard, I mean, cheap games that don't get monthly $ seem to be able to do it. (star trek legacy, for 1. pretty accurate 3D models there)
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1539
12-06-2011, 09:26 AM
Is this the right thread to post about ship hardpoint issues?

I have a Venture-X-class equipped with heavy cannons and dual beams that both fire from the furthest most port and starboard sides of the saucer section, even though the beams should be firing from midway between the bridge and outer edge of the saucer and the cannons should be firing from the physical cannons near the mid section of the saucer near the bridge.

I haven't checked to see if this effects the Galaxy-X-class, does anyone know of this issue?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1540
12-06-2011, 12:14 PM
Does not affect the Galaxy-X, only the Venture. We've been complaining about this issue since it was released. No word.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:34 PM.