Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 421
08-10-2010, 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Direphoenix View Post
ugh... MVAM was the worst idea ever. Take a glass cannon and split it up into three even more fragile pieces, no thank you. And I choose to fly an Advanced Escort. No Voltron ships, please.
Ehh, it could be an interesting thing, to suddenly make the ship far more manoeuvrable (defiant-like), while flying in close formation it would make it difficult for the opponent to target the main ship, severely increasing survivability.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 422
08-10-2010, 06:20 PM
My ships name is missing on the right side of my Escort Retrofit Defiant Nacelles, not sure if this has been posted yet

http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w...0-21-19-07.jpg
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 423 Minor defiant issue
08-10-2010, 07:25 PM
Just wanted to point out that the starbord necelle of the new defiant model is vary slightly inbord compared to the port necelle. this is most notable from the stern as the hull cuts into the warp feild grille. also notacable from the dorsal and ventral veiws but less so. From th fore it is noticable that the phse cannon ports ar closer to the hull on the starbord (left from for veiw) side. This is minor but irritating as I have to look at it all the time lol. BTW ive looked over and over and it is not an optical illusion.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 424
08-10-2010, 09:34 PM
I created a feedback post for the fixes you've done over the Luna with a lot of images to better illustrate my observations.

You can find the post here:
http://forums.startrekonline.com/sho...65#post2938565
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 425
08-10-2010, 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapnLogan
Gorgeous, as usual, Capn! ^.^ Though I must echo the person who asked about flipping the Starfleet emblems, they're all facing the wrong way on all the ships.

I've removed the fixed issues from the Luna section of the first page but left in one of the links as it points out one, maybe two issues that still remain. The only one I noticed was the missing escape pods behind the bridge superstructure.


=edit=


Personally I'd love to see some love given to my absolute favourite ship, the Akira, but until they create a T5 retrofit, I can wait. ^.^

P.S. Cap'n, push for a carrier Akira refit like in this link. ^.^ (Its designer, Alex Jaeger had originally intended it to be a carrier gunship. ^.^ )

=edit=





Updated the first page:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Direphoenix View Post
Advanced Escort - Cerberus Saucer

Missing illumination points for upper registry lights and forward saucer deflector (The effect is there but there is no light where it looks like it should be coming from)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MightionNY View Post
I wonder, if I asked nice, if CaptLogan would lower the size of the font used for the registry on Sovereign nacelles. While the new Sovereign is a wonderful work of art, my ship's name is slightly too long to fit on the nacelles.

Like so.
Added to the front page, even though the capn has already acknowledged it. :3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilv View Post
Hey Capn, I just wanted to first say thanx for all the hard work you are putting in to these ships. They look better and better.

Secondly I wanted to point out some issues I have noticed w/ the defiant that I haven't seen adressed just yet in the forums

The "fleet logo section on the defiant hill gets cut off if any nacelles other than the Defiant nacelles get used

http://i733.photobucket.com/albums/w...0-18-59-06.jpg
Ditto

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilv View Post
there is a section of texture on the bottom of the hull that is cut in half

http://i733.photobucket.com/albums/w...5-09-23-00.jpg
Already on the first page

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_illustrious_q
I noticed a few issues with the Galaxy-X model.

First, there is a slight gap between the manuavering wings and the nacelle pylons. It isn't noticable too much from far away but when up close, as seen in this pic:

http://i721.photobucket.com/albums/w...del-Bugs-1.png

http://i721.photobucket.com/albums/w...del-Bugs-3.png

http://i721.photobucket.com/albums/w...del-Bugs-4.png
Added, as well.


Everyone, please use imgur.com or tinypic or another url shortener; space within the posts is precious and hard to divvy up sensibly. The best option is to use something to shorten the urls.

imgur is a good option because you can crop, rotate and resize your images before finalising the upload.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 426
08-10-2010, 10:29 PM
Snip, should have just added it to the post above
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 427
08-11-2010, 02:35 AM
You also forgot to add the texture issue with the Galaxy X. I can tall you that that is a problem with the Galaxy-X and not the regular Galaxy.

EDIT: Nevermind, found the problem. Disregard.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 428
08-11-2010, 07:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapnLogan
LOL that looks silly - i'll do my best to get a fix for that patched in to 2.1
EEEEK my hero hast posted !!!

If you fix the issue with the Shipname on the warp engines maybe you can look to fix fast these?

http://forums.startrekonline.com/sho...&postcount=383
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 429
08-11-2010, 10:56 AM
Once again you prove your Godliness, Sir! That's a beautiful ship!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by CapnLogan
NEXT!!!!
Assault Cruiser Nav Strobe Lights!!! (Please?)
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 430
08-11-2010, 12:04 PM
all I ever see is post upon post of fed ships seeing fixes and upgrades several times per ship, and klingon ships get next to no mention on new ships, much less fixes to current ships, or customizations added to new and existing ships...
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:25 AM.