Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 51
12-01-2010, 12:18 AM
The PVP game has never been balanced, I remember in the very beginning (either the OB or at Launch) there was a better chance that Star Trek: Enterprise would be picked up for a fifth season than a Klingon team would win a FvK match. And ever since then Cryptic has kept nerfing the Fed until the PvP is just not fun at all. Either its a turkey shoot for the klinks or I'm being massacred as the feds.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 52
12-01-2010, 03:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KhansWrath
i vote for feds to get their weak battleship

i also vote for klingons to get their proper illegal in the federation weapons of mass destruction like mass drivers biological weapons and sun exploding torpedoes. the kdf wasnt so short sighted as the federation, we didnt ban these weapons research and developement.
Actually those types of weapons are illegal for the Klingons. And the Romulans, Cardassians and most of the other "large" powers in the Alpha and Beta quadrants. They were all banned in the Khitomer Accords which the before mentioned races all signed.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 53
12-01-2010, 04:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Korhil
Actually those types of weapons are illegal for the Klingons. And the Romulans, Cardassians and most of the other "large" powers in the Alpha and Beta quadrants. They were all banned in the Khitomer Accords which the before mentioned races all signed.
The banning of Subspace weapons are the only weapons actually specified, when the Son'a were using them in Insurrection in 2375. Additionally, the primary purpose of the Khitomer Accords was to create an alliance/truce between the Federation and the Empire.

The Imperial Romulan State, Ferengi Alliance, Cardassian Union, and Talarians were invited in 2381 to form a strong line against a massive Borg invasion.

This invasion is not part of STO's time line.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 54
12-01-2010, 12:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormShade
We don't consider carriers to be OP. There are many skills and abilities which work quite well to counter their abilities. If you honestly believe that you should be able to face roll your keyboard and still win at PvP regardless of what your opponent's or your own build and or team is made up of, to quote myself:

"It's time to wake up and smell the disruptor burns."

PvP is, was, and will remain a game of skill, strategy, and teamwork. Change your strategy up, try a different build, continue to hone your PvP skills. Or, keep posting circular arguments. I'll continue to close threads that contain them.

Thanks,

Stormshade
Since Carriers aren't OP, no re-balancing needed. Thus, No Fed Carriers, and no Fed Battleships.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 55
12-01-2010, 01:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katic View Post
Since Carriers aren't OP, no re-balancing needed. Thus, No Fed Carriers, and no Fed Battleships.
Ok, i am going to make this clear and simple for those who play on the klingon side...SHUT UP ABOUT the Federation not need a carrier or battleship im tired of all of the crap you klingon people are whining about the federation does not need a carrier or battleship so SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!we would like a battleship to make it even against the klingons carrier....ALRIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:ma d:
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 56
12-01-2010, 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyager235 View Post
Ok, i am going to make this clear and simple for those who play on the klingon side...SHUT UP ABOUT the Federation not need a carrier or battleship im tired of all of the crap you klingon people are whining about the federation does not need a carrier or battleship so SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!we would like a battleship to make it even against the klingons carrier....ALRIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:ma d:
Feds don't need a carrier or a battleship.

Just teamwork.

And heals passed down to escorts.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 57
12-01-2010, 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SP3CTREnyc
Feds don't need a carrier or a battleship.

Just teamwork.

And heals passed down to escorts.
your right and your wrong....to me klingons are cheaters....they cower behind fighers so to even the odds we need a battleship that sends them running and crying back to their mommys.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 58
12-01-2010, 01:44 PM
Quote:
your right and your wrong....to me klingons are cheaters....they cower behind fighers so to even the odds we need a battleship that sends them running and crying back to their mommys.
Those fighters aren't drones. They are manned by Klingons.

Unless of course you meant he player is a coward because he is hiding behind fighters.
But then, I didn't buy Startrek Online or subscribe to it to do it the "courageous" way and beat you up in a fistfight. I actually wanted to fight "hiding" behind space ships. (Though not behind fighters, because Battlestar Galactica is another franchise then STO is part of.)
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 59
12-01-2010, 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyager235 View Post
Ok, i am going to make this clear and simple for those who play on the klingon side...SHUT UP ABOUT the Federation not need a carrier or battleship im tired of all of the crap you klingon people are whining about the federation does not need a carrier or battleship so SHUT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!we would like a battleship to make it even against the klingons carrier....ALRIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:ma d:
I play mostly Fed. I have 4 Fed VA characters. I do have a klink that I play sometimes, but he is only LTC. One of my Fed is specced for PVP. No, the Feds do not need a carrier or a battleship. I've done my share of arena matches against Klinks including carriers. By no means do they win everytime. In fact, sometimes, the carrier proves to be the squishiest target. It is all about the teamwork. Generally speaking, the times that I lose is when I am on a PUG team. The times that I win is when I am playing with my fleet. The only problem I see is the targeting issue, and sometimes the lag with so many pets. This actually makes it "not fun", but if the devs can find a way around the targeting problem, it would be a lot better.

Katic merely quoted what Stormshade has posted. Being one of the devs, I think he knows what he is talking about.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 60
12-01-2010, 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Voyager235 View Post
your right and your wrong....to me klingons are cheaters....they cower behind fighers so to even the odds we need a battleship that sends them running and crying back to their mommys.
So hiding behind the big shields of a mighty battleship is not "cheating" (which is a serious accusation BTW) because...?
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 PM.