Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 11
05-08-2011, 04:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by piwright42 View Post
Beyond what I am about to write, the OP does not even deserve a comment. There I wrote it, and that...
And yet....we are all drawn to threads like this one like a moth to a flame.:p
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 12
05-08-2011, 05:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHARKFORCE View Post
And yet....we are all drawn to threads like this one like a moth to a flame.:p
It's kinda like the sensitive tooth I keep playing with. Yeah it hurts but I am still on the fence whether or not it hurts so good.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 13
05-08-2011, 08:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHARKFORCE View Post
And yet....we are all drawn to threads like this one like a moth to a flame.:p
I'm obessed to such threads due to my fear of teh Devs taking them seriuosly and tipping the game out of balance due to fed misconceptions.

That couldn't happen? could it?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 14
05-08-2011, 08:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roach View Post
I'm obessed to such threads due to my fear of teh Devs taking them seriuosly and tipping the game out of balance due to fed misconceptions.

That couldn't happen? could it?
Better to be safe than sorry.......I'm not taking any chances.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 15
05-08-2011, 09:01 AM
Well, you never know but since they did not implement Voyager 235's request for a Federation Battleship that could defeat 7 or 8 carriers along with their fighters simultaneously,

http://forums.startrekonline.com/sho...66#post3183566

where he never indicated the federation should not be able to field as many of those ships as the Klignons field carriers, there is evidence the Devs don't impement every...creative idea.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 16
05-08-2011, 09:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mister_dee
Well, you never know but since they did not implement Voyager 235's request for a Federation Battleship that could defeat 7 or 8 carriers along with their fighters simultaneously,

http://forums.startrekonline.com/sho...66#post3183566

where he never indicated the federation should not be able to field as many of those ships as the Klignons field carriers, there is evidence the Devs don't impement every...creative idea.
That...uhm....very creative idea is a bit on the obvious side......but there are more...uhm....briliant ideas out there that are less obvious......we are not taking any chances.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 17
05-08-2011, 09:37 AM
You all I know I want this idea of layered shielding for all sides not just for the Federation, All sides should be able to stack shields or engines.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 18
05-08-2011, 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmiralBlack10 View Post
You all I know I want this idea of layered shielding for all sides not just for the Federation, All sides should be able to stack shields or engines.
There is no point in having layered shields or stacking shields/engines from a gameplay point of view.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 19
05-08-2011, 10:20 AM
You can't layer forcefields - esp. not a forcefield you call shields.
What you try is to let energy pass through a oneside open field and generate a oneside open field.
The whole idea is half baked and nonsens at all.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 20
05-08-2011, 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ihnako View Post
You can't layer forcefields!!!!
Why not? I make a delicious layered Forcefield cake.....
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:44 AM.