Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 21
07-25-2011, 10:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasGideon
Honestly, and this is going to ruffle a LOT of feathers...

The Carriers should never have been included. They should, frankly, be removed.

Why?

Because they seem to cause no end of trouble, either through balance issues, or simple target flooding.


Now, I personally can deal with Carriers in PvP with little to no difficulty. I'm sure many other experienced players can as well.

However, my point still stands. It has been a source of unending issues, with continual nerfs and tweaks in an attempt to wrangle it under control. I would not be surprise if, when another Tier is opened for FA, Cryptic simply quietly omits a higher rank of Carrier.
Awww.

Actually that would be crafty and brilliant. The carrier is a big draw for folks to play Klingon. By the time the cap is raised the Klingon side may be a lot further toward completion and no longer need a big shiney.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 22
07-25-2011, 11:28 AM
Why do people condone this thread by posting on here? Most people just see this as a silly thread built around frustration at an aspect of the game. As the Devs have told the Feds how to deal with carriers already in an official post. Plus the Vo’quv was just nerfed the heck out of a few months back lowing the dps and survivability.

Oh dang, I just posted on this silly thread! Hahahaha

PS: I would play a Fed too if they just had a carrier. Oh wait; it is a draw for the game!
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 23
07-25-2011, 11:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasGideon
However, my point still stands. It has been a source of unending issues, with continual nerfs and tweaks in an attempt to wrangle it under control. I would not be surprise if, when another Tier is opened for FA, Cryptic simply quietly omits a higher rank of Carrier.
Probably wouldn't work. By tier 6, I imagine that's when they introduce the Akira-R-X Carrier-Escort that so many people have been asking for.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 24
07-25-2011, 12:25 PM
Don't forget the bloody thing has two nacelles. That's not balance. It has a huge hull so to be balanced it has to give something up. I mean ships with cloak generally have lower base hull, so the Voquv needs some trade off. I say give up half of the engine systems, preferably on the left side. I love sitting in one spot and just spinning around at like .2 degrees per second. Hellz yeah.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 25
07-25-2011, 01:05 PM
Am I in the wrong forums? Seems like an all too familliar thread to another popular mmo. (And with that being said)
Fail troll is Fail. That is all. (also IBL/IBD, et al)
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 26
07-25-2011, 01:15 PM
Trolllolololololol hahaha. This thread is winning.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 27
07-25-2011, 04:20 PM
Heh, epic thread. All of the non-PvPing klings fell for it so very hard.

Hey non-PvPing klings, why don't you guys make fleets and PvP and learn to play the game at a higher level? Then you would know who the OP is and know that he's being completely sarcastic creating epic lulz at your expense. Or you could just go back to Klingon PvE!

...heh :p
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 28
07-26-2011, 03:36 AM
Heh..

QEW have been full of win these past few months, and not just in Arenas
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 29
07-26-2011, 03:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by K-rog View Post
wow, really? Yer joking right? Maybe they should just limit all Klingons to having two warriors in mag boots standing on the hull throwing harsh language and rocks...
NO! Rocks make Kinetic damage, thats way OP!!!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigduckie
i am ashamed of the first three posters after the op. that being said. inb4dreadlox
Well you are "ashamed" of people simply giving their opinion and disagreeing with ANOTHER Nerf-Thread like that one:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kirian_darkstar View Post
sorry. don't agree with you on any of those points.
I thing you better should be ashamed of yourself....

Quote:
Originally Posted by gx4th View Post
If you've seen the original poster flying in pvp, and even saw what his fleet tag was, you'd know he's capable of quickly killing you.
LOL. How would you know if he can "Quickly" kill me? If he were any good in PVP he simply wouldnt cry for nerf.


About the Topic itsself; I just can quote from another nerf-thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koppenflak
Dear Dev,

Paper needs nerf, Scissors fine.

Yours sincerely,
Rock
Nothing to add...
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 30
07-26-2011, 03:58 AM
This is the thread that keeps on giving. How can these people not realize what is going on yet? We've actually went out and said it a few times now, and they still don't see it
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:08 AM.