> > > Hi Captains! The team continues to investigate an issue where some players may be stuck on a loading screen. We appreciate your continued patience! < < <
Jolan tru Captain!
Welcome to Legacy of Romulus!
If you have purchased a Legacy or Starter Pack, please see this thread for instructions on how to claim your items in-game. (Please see the yellow text in the linked thread for instructions on creating a Reman.) (Not seeing your pack in-game? Please see the lime-green text in the linked thread above for information.)
If you have additional questions about the Legacy or Starter pack, please read this FAQ.
Thanks SO MUCH for all your support, and we'll see you in-game!
- The Star Trek Online Team
***Resolved Issues***
"Login failed for unknown reason" error
Missing additional character slot for current/ lapsed Gold Members
Slow patching in the launcher
A bug that involved Romulan Liberated Borg captains and their skills once they chose an ally
Yeah , i love the Balmung too ;p
But it shows what i mean , that there are gaps in designs , we have what could be the gap between C and D fleshed out , with the Cheyenne and New Orleans classes
and bits of D to E with the Steamrunner and Akira , but there are still plenty of gaps which could easily be filled in ;p
As much as this is cool. Where are the flipping canon ships! e.g 2nd phase sovereign refit, ambassdor class, maybe the nx refit that would be awesome and etc.
The only one of those that is, in fact, canon is the Ambassador (Which I'm still betting on being a T4 equivalent to the T3 Excelsior at some point)
The Sovereign and NX refits were both proposed ship designs that were never actually seen on screen. They are no more canon than the Ambassador Prototype or the Voyager prototype.
Remember, just because you think something looks cool doesn't make it canon unless you can point out the actual episode or movie where the design showed up.
The only one of those that is, in fact, canon is the Ambassador (Which I'm still betting on being a T4 equivalent to the T3 Excelsior at some point)
The Sovereign and NX refits were both proposed ship designs that were never actually seen on screen. They are no more canon than the Ambassador Prototype or the Voyager prototype.
Remember, just because you think something looks cool doesn't make it canon unless you can point out the actual episode or movie where the design showed up.
They are not the propsed desgins they are the finalized design nx refit and the sovereign refit is canon. It is stated that it was going to be in nemesis but it was pulled out due to budget reasons. So it is canon. The nx refit was going to be used for the next season if enterprise was renewed for another season. If it is stated by the desginer or the company but not used in star trek tv series or movies its still canon.
They are not the propsed desgins they are the finalized design nx refit and the sovereign refit is canon. It is stated that it was going to be in nemesis but it was pulled out due to budget reasons. So it is canon. The nx refit was going to be used for the next season if enterprise was renewed for another season. If it is stated by the desginer or the company but not used in star trek tv series or movies its still canon.
Not correct, the Nemesis version was in Nemesis, so it is canon.
The fleet that was supposed to meet the Enterprise was pulled due to budget constraints, not the Enterprise.
The Kzinti were planned for the 5th season of "Enterprise".
They were not in since the show was cancelled after Season 4.
Hence Cryptic could not use them in STO.
What was not on screen is not canon.
The fleet that was supposed to meet the Enterprise was pulled due to budget constraints, not the Enterprise.
The Kzinti were planned for the 5th season of "Enterprise".
They were not in since the show was cancelled after Season 4.
Hence Cryptic could not use them in STO.
What was not on screen is not canon.
As far as I am aware Cryptic is not limited to only putting canon things in-game. They can put in hard or soft and even make up new stuff as long as they get approval from... CBS was it?
Anyway, Cryptic and STO is in NO way limited to canon ideas, ships or concepts and hopefully in my opinion it will never be.
As far as I am aware Cryptic is not limited to only putting canon things in-game. They can put in hard or soft and even make up new stuff as long as they get approval from... CBS was it?
Anyway, Cryptic and STO is in NO way limited to canon ideas, ships or concepts and hopefully in my opinion it will never be.
-Quiiliitiila
Anyone who says different obviously didn't read the New Frontier series or they'd know that Capt Calhoun at K-7 comes from. Or the Titan series which gave the game the Luna class ships.
As far as I am aware Cryptic is not limited to only putting canon things in-game. They can put in hard or soft and even make up new stuff as long as they get approval from... CBS was it?
Anyway, Cryptic and STO is in NO way limited to canon ideas, ships or concepts and hopefully in my opinion it will never be.
-Quiiliitiila
They are also limited by who holds the license to an idea.
In case of the Kzinti that's still Niven and out of the question, in case of ships from other game companies dstahl said they can't be referenced in one "Ask Cryptic" editon and in case of unreleased ships...?
Who holds the license to the unused Intrepid or the Probert Ambassador?
They are also limited by who holds the license to an idea.
In case of the Kzinti that's still Niven and out of the question, in case of ships from other game companies dstahl said they can't be referenced in one "Ask Cryptic" editon and in case of unreleased ships...?
Who holds the license to the unused Intrepid or the Probert Ambassador?
Gee I had no Idea how dispersed the licenses were for the various pieces of Star Trek stuff. I say we all design our own ships copyright them and then give the rights to cryptic for kicks and giggles!