I think that any community moderator that is picked should be required to have a dispute button/abuse button under their name, so in the case of abuse or a dispute someone from cryptic can go over all the logs and see if anybody needs a spanking.
Yep, even if they are wrong, or hell, even if they're right
But if they're beligerant, then they can go and get knotted. Or I'll at least try and calm then down first and try to get a non-goon response out of them. lol
I think that any community moderator that is picked should be required to have a dispute button/abuse button under their name, so in the case of abuse or a dispute someone from cryptic can go over all the logs and see if anybody needs a spanking.
If anyone but Dan Stahl tries to spank me, I'll put up a fight. lol
(I'm assuming Dan Stahl is Alec Baldwin in 30 Rock) :p
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
Yes we know. Your First Amendment rights, Freedom of Speech, but do you remember when you had first toggled the check that you had read and agreed to follow Cryptics TOS at the beginning? To follow their rules, which includes the forum posting rules?
"Ones argument loses validity when known to be a liar from it's offset."