Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1 Dominion Wars Galaxy
01-24-2012, 11:17 PM
I was watching DS9 and thinking about how weak in game the Galaxy Class is combat wise 1 lt tactical station. During the Dominion War from what we saw from fleet battles (season 5 onwards) not a single Galaxy Class was destroyed and they were the only other Federation ship onscreen shown to make a kill Defiant being the other one
The Captain Level Galaxy should have been the explorer/engineer ship and how the current retro fit is and the Retro should have been a Battleship with this lay out

4 fore and aft weapon slots
4 engineer consoles
3 science
3 Tactical

Boff
either
2 x lt tactical or 1 x lt commander Tactical
1x commander engineer
1 x lt command engineer
1 x lt science

drop the ensign engineer slot.

Or better yet keep the same configuration but still drop the ensign engineer slot and go this way

1 x lt tactical
1 x commander engineer
1 x lt commander universal slot (can be used for engineer/tactical or science)
1 x lt commander science giving the ensign engineer to science

Whats peoples thoughts i want a Galaxy not a Galaxy-x that is not a liability in PvE Elite runs.

The Galaxy was a beast during the Dominion War forget the Oddessey that was pre-war tensions
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 2
01-24-2012, 11:54 PM
Let me geuss... You fly a galaxy?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 3
01-25-2012, 12:25 AM
Actually I fly either a defiant/sovereign/nebula/Prometheus/excelsior/galaxy x or a galaxy depending on my fancy. However I would love to fly the galaxy as my primary ship but she isn't tough enough tactically to stand up in pve with the other ships mentioned for my fighting style. The nebula out tanks the galaxy
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 4
01-25-2012, 12:43 AM
Thing is, using your changes, the Galaxy would become a good tad stronger than it is currently, and as such would offset balance... PvE it dosen't matter much, and I would like to see the "strong ships become strong" again, but we have to think of the poor PvP'ers... They get so little already.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 5
01-25-2012, 12:52 AM
I know but I want a strong galaxy. Galaxy-x is ok but i don't like the skin
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 6
01-25-2012, 06:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doylematt4 View Post
I know but I want a strong galaxy. Galaxy-x is ok but i don't like the skin
WHAT MADNESS IS THIS?

i love the Galaxy X, and when i get it borged up and geared....well.....much messiness will happen soon after

i mean it has three nacelles THREE OF EM!!!
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 7
01-25-2012, 06:26 AM
The game's Galaxy is weak compared to the show's? Anyone remember the USS Odyssey getting take out by 3 Jem attack ships?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzARkU5l2JE
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 8
01-25-2012, 06:51 AM
it was a suicide run
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 9
01-25-2012, 06:55 AM
Quote:
it was a suicide run
And that's really the point. Ships are only as tough or as weak as any particular writer wants them to be. They're never consistent. The game requires a consistency the shows never had to deal with.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 10
01-25-2012, 06:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cosmic_One View Post
The game's Galaxy is weak compared to the show's? Anyone remember the USS Odyssey getting take out by 3 Jem attack ships?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzARkU5l2JE
Actually, when you consider how easily the Ent-D went down vs a single B'rel that could shoot through its shields, the Odyssey did pretty well faced with 3 opponents with the same capability.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 AM.