Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 11
02-14-2012, 11:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunnerChase View Post
I quite agree , im suprised i havent consulted a therapist since ive been online
naaa * pats him on the back really hard knocking the wind out of him * you will be fine. I have a feeling that you are a great Internet worrier in the making. Qapla
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 12
02-15-2012, 01:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zodi-emish
naaa * pats him on the back really hard knocking the wind out of him * you will be fine. I have a feeling that you are a great Internet worrier in the making. Qapla
I know RighT !! but when ? , my short internet gaming XP has been one long *CENSORED*Kicking everytime i log in , i blow a fuse becouse someone kill's me by snapping there fingeR's , but it's ALL GooD , im getting betteR .
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 13
02-15-2012, 01:36 AM
Yellow responses to unconditional praise for the amazing employees of Cryptic but not the 150+ page Galor thread.

Uh huh.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 14
02-15-2012, 01:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aestu
Yellow responses to unconditional praise for the amazing employees of Cryptic but not the 150+ page Galor thread.

Uh huh.
Yeah, they should reply to all threads that a free of substance equally.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 15
02-15-2012, 01:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunnerChase View Post

what do we call them ? ohh yeh " counsleR Troy's
Did he just make a funny?

Welcome to the Darkside of Star Trek Online, your @ss is ours now, muwahahahaha
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 16
02-15-2012, 01:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral_Kristov
Yeah, they should reply to all threads that a free of substance equally.
If the issue is important to people, it has substance.

I wrote a detailed post giving my impressions of STO for good and bad. So far as feedback goes, that's substance. Saying, "UR AWSOM" is not "substance". It is the opposite of substance.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 17
02-15-2012, 01:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aestu
If the issue is important to people, it has substance.

I wrote a detailed post giving my impressions of STO for good and bad. So far as feedback goes, that's substance. Saying, "UR AWSOM" is not "substance". It is the opposite of substance.
He's a taco headed star fleet officer. what do you expect from him?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 18
02-15-2012, 01:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aestu
If the issue is important to people, it has substance.

I wrote a detailed post giving my impressions of STO for good and bad. So far as feedback goes, that's substance. Saying, "UR AWSOM" is not "substance". It is the opposite of substance.
By that logic, to me, your comments that I have seen so far lack substance.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 19
02-15-2012, 02:53 AM
oh chit . . . . O_O "

there's some substance for you hahahaha
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 20
02-15-2012, 03:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aestu
Yellow responses to unconditional praise for the amazing employees of Cryptic but not the 150+ page Galor thread.

Uh huh.
Yeah I know right. Nor any replies in the 175+ page Loot Box thread. Other than to tell us we are all a bunch of whining babies and that we are wrong about the drop rates.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:26 AM.