Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 1 A change to MVAM escort.
02-13-2012, 04:26 PM
this escort is very good ship, i use it well, but one thing bugs me.. the 3rd tact station ensign .... why is it even there lol.For cannon build its completely useless lol .it should be removed, and make the second station lt commander. that will make it so much better and way worth cryptic points that would mean we'd be able to have torp spread 3 and HY 3 which would help a great deal in dps .
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 2
02-13-2012, 04:37 PM
Have you tried the MVAM console on the original Advanced escort? It has higher level tac stations.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 3
02-13-2012, 04:41 PM
i'm talking about the actual bridge officer stations. not consoles
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 4
02-13-2012, 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exeviper View Post
i'm talking about the actual bridge officer stations. not consoles
So was he... The Advanced Escort and the MVAE are the same ship except that their Bridge Officer stations are re-arranged a bit.

However, I agree... Ensign Tactical is a waste. It would be far better off with an Ensign Sci or Engineering if it MUST have an Ensign.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 5
02-13-2012, 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exeviper View Post
the 3rd tact station ensign .... why is it even there lol:
Ahhh the useless ensign tactical station. Also known as the "Wheaton Seat" .

I usualy use it for a second tac team. Rotating two tac teams is effective. The third i put a HY 1 or BO3...

For a cannon/torp build, the HY 1, TT1, TT1, APB 1, CRF1, crf2 ,APO3 is a nice layout for mvam, Although i sometimes swap the beta for a hy2. i find the beta usally is better, even with the omega conflict.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 6
02-14-2012, 05:28 AM
That ensign tac is really annoying indeed. Should be eng or sci. Preferably sci. Like advanced escort.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 7
02-14-2012, 10:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinkuu_Akagan
So was he... The Advanced Escort and the MVAE are the same ship except that their Bridge Officer stations are re-arranged a bit.

However, I agree... Ensign Tactical is a waste. It would be far better off with an Ensign Sci or Engineering if it MUST have an Ensign.
a waste? i think not. i put in Tac Team there, so that i can run two on the engisn slots, and for the their ensign slot i run torp spread. that way i can keep tac team going with a short intermission between the two while the one cools down.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 8
02-14-2012, 11:02 AM
hmm, well i have tact team 1 twice, i have torp spread 2 &3 cannon scatter vollet 1 & 3 (for my mvam escort, and my 3rd tact has beam skills for when using cruiser. it is a waste costhey're isn't much skills for that slot that u dont already have espically for cannon builds
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 9
02-14-2012, 11:15 AM
I use it for my 3rd tac team.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 10
02-14-2012, 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ensignfreekill
Ahhh the useless ensign tactical station. Also known as the "Wheaton Seat" .

I usualy use it for a second tac team. Rotating two tac teams is effective. The third i put a HY 1 or BO3...

For a cannon/torp build, the HY 1, TT1, TT1, APB 1, CRF1, crf2 ,APO3 is a nice layout for mvam, Although i sometimes swap the beta for a hy2. i find the beta usally is better, even with the omega conflict.
I can't remember for sure, but isn't there attack pattern's for Ensigns???
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 AM.