Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 111
04-17-2012, 10:45 AM
Quote:
heh, someone couldn't read the directions given twice, and the same direction listed in the Objectives Panel and ... I kid you not... said that I should be "shot" for it.

I'd be worried if I believed he'd be smart enough to put a bullet in the gun the right way.
Whenever you think something in this game or any other is dumbed down, always think of reviewers like this one. This is what game developers are fighting against day after day.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 112
04-17-2012, 11:06 AM
I think I've seen the best reviews today:
usmc9aarking: * "NEEDS MORE INFO WHERE KEI IS!!!"
Broken_Fox: ** "At least give a clue where the system is."
Monkeyman8290: * "in next edit, make sure to put in where the Kei system is, couldnt play because I didnt know..."

Ladies and gentleman, let me present you the location of the Kei system:
http://www.stowiki.org/images/e/e4/SectorMapVulcan.png

There is no facepalm epic enought for this.
Enjoy the civilization while you can. People with that IQ rate won't be able to hold it up for long.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 113
04-17-2012, 04:26 PM
What mission is that?
I feel like 5-starring it just on general principles...
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 114
04-17-2012, 04:28 PM
Next,people will ask where Earth Spacedock is
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 115
04-17-2012, 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pendra80 View Post
I think I've seen the best reviews today:
usmc9aarking: * "NEEDS MORE INFO WHERE KEI IS!!!"
Broken_Fox: ** "At least give a clue where the system is."
Monkeyman8290: * "in next edit, make sure to put in where the Kei system is, couldnt play because I didnt know..."

Ladies and gentleman, let me present you the location of the Kei system:
http://www.stowiki.org/images/e/e4/SectorMapVulcan.png

There is no facepalm epic enought for this.
Enjoy the civilization while you can. People with that IQ rate won't be able to hold it up for long.
Are you mentioning the sector block it's in, because that could be the cause of the problems? If people don't know the sector block, finding the system is kind of tough.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 116
04-17-2012, 11:14 PM
Not my mission luckily. I agree that the sector block should be included, but it is something you can find in a min in google. Also we are not talking about an NGC4352XX system far north.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 117
04-18-2012, 01:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ranger_Ryu
Next,people will ask where Earth Spacedock is
Too late.

"Took me a while. ESD is earth space doc for those who don't know."
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 118
04-18-2012, 03:42 AM
Quote:
Not my mission luckily. I agree that the sector block should be included, but it is something you can find in a min in google. Also we are not talking about an NGC4352XX system far north.
Google is not part of your Foundry mission. I think it's okay to expect the Sector Block and the Planet to be contained in mission dialog and the mission tracker. But anything more, and people are just dense and you can't help them.

Of course, Cryptic would do good if "mission doors" would be highlighted in some way on the Sector Block Map or your general UI. Or if Foundry missions also would get a "transwarp" button.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 119
04-18-2012, 08:34 AM
This is something that's been a problem since the beginning of the Foundry. Believe me it's worse if your door is on a social map. We can put as detailed directions as we can as many times as we can, but at a certain point it's still up to the player to figure it out and if we've done our due diligence, they have no one to blame but themselves. How much you want to bet Cryptic has received more than a few bug tickets that read "I can't find how to start XX mission!!! QQ."

I agree through that Cryptic could add some features to help, like an indicator on the map or a transwarp (I often feel like that's a cop out and takes away from immersion, but it is convenient).

Actually I would like to see a system where you go to a star system and it gives you a menu to click on that will show you all Foundry missions that begin at that system.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
Understanding Soleta's Foundry Star Rating Proposal
================================================== ========================================
Greetings and Salutations;

I am known as Soleta, of 12th Fleet's Section 31 Division;

I'm a Silver player and although I've only been playing the game for about four (4) month's and in that time I've met some very Impressive and Important people! I'm enjoying the People involved in the foundry more than the game itself. I have yet to complete a faction feature episode :-), anyway over the last few weeks I've begun to see many of our visions and collaborations within the foundry community originating from these chance meetings become reality.
================================================== ================================================== ===============================

I would like to propose discussion on a Foundry rating System, I have taken much of what I've learned in my journey's through foundry missions and the forum's and would like your thoughts on the following.

The Cryptic Star rating System would split into two (2) levels of a three (3) star rating system. This is due to a growing void in the current star rating system to give a valid foundation to new Foundry authors when compared and measured against Experienced Founders. In this rating system an experienced Founder should never get a rating below Three (3), unless the work was totally below experienced community expectations. and a new beginning Founder would get a fair rating of Two (2), Unless the work was totally above average beginner or experimental level work. In this system if a beginner rates a 5 Star with their mission they will gain and deserve community celebrity status of "Accolade - Ascended". In this same system if a veteran rates a 2 Star with their mission they will gain and deserve community "Outcast" status, until they redeem themselves to a Four (4) star status or better, and maintain this level with their next two (2) or three (3) missions.

3 Stars is the middle ground it is an average rating for Level Two and above average for level one. Three missions at this rating for a 4 or 5 star rating Founder constitutes a falling from grace ("Accolade - Descended"). While three missions at this rating for a 1 or 2 star rating Apprentice constitutes a level 2 rating ("Accolade - Ascended").

Level One (Apprentice):
Rating system for Beginners, Average Founders and Daily missions (I like to leave room for growth)
No Star = Didn't Rate the story needs develop work, Only published to Flesh-out the story in real play.
1 Star = Good Effort: Needs work, Author needs to spend more time on Writing Techniques and/or Foundry Skills.
2 Stars = Very Good: well done could use more Depth of story and/or Foundry content (Actually 3 Stars for this level of rating)


Level Two (Founder):
Rating system for Experienced and Professional Founders(These Founders have a few published missions, are seriously into the Foundry as the life blood of the game and are working on Epic status).
3 Stars = Average: Was fun and entertaining but nothing Unique from the normal, or not ranking as Epic or Memorable within the STO Foundry Canon.
4 Stars = Excellent: Above average Story and Content, Author has a good storyline and foundry Skills.
5 Stars = Epic: Professional work, a Developer Level mission. Characters of Foundry mission are an important part of the story, and may even transcend the mission to become a memorable and popular figure within the STO Foundry canon.(Actually 3 Stars for this level of rating).

So in this rating System you actually have Six (6) Status's of Foundry Authors.
1 Apprentice (1 & 2 Stars)
2 Outcast (Fallen Founder)
3 Accolade (3 Stars)
3D - (Accolade - Descended)
3A - (Accolade - Ascended)
4 Founder (4 & 5 Stars)

NOTE 1: In this rating system only a Accolade or Founder, meaning only actual Foundry experienced Authors would be able to rate another Accolade or Founder below 3 stars and have it register as a statistic of the Mission/Author. All others will just register as Mission feedback, (If they leave a comment), rather than a Mission review.

NOTE 2: STO Foundry Canon = The growth of Stories and Characters developed by Star trek online Founders that have become memorable and popular within the Star trek Online Community, and has been set as part of the Star Trek online Community Canon.

this Ranking system can even evolve into a new aspect of In-Game Ranking and Title. I'd rather have a "Founder" title in my name in-game than "Diplomat" or Accolade lets people know I'm a Foundry Author.


Everyone should remember the Foundry is still in Beta and we all have a chance to mold it into the tool we want it to become.

Your Thoughts and ideals. Non Foundry authors negative Opinions will be ignored, as unknowledgeable babble.

I have stepped from the Shadows and revealed myself to you:

Solo - The Shadow Hunter
Live Long and Prosper
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:26 PM.