Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 21
06-13-2012, 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucianalliance View Post
I'm surprised you missed the purpose of my post and forgot which side of the line I stand.
I'm surprised too. But not surprised that you're surprised, which perhaps, is surprising?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 22
06-13-2012, 06:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebeneezergoode
I'm surprised too. But not surprised that you're surprised, which perhaps, is surprising?
Suprisa!!!
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 23
06-14-2012, 12:53 AM
No.

I would be happy to see one side or the other get something new. Turning both factions into an EXACT copy of each other is a horrible idea.

It's this kind of thinking that makes a bland game.

If you want frigates go KDF.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 24
06-14-2012, 08:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by laggyd View Post
No.

I would be happy to see one side or the other get something new. Turning both factions into an EXACT copy of each other is a horrible idea.

It's this kind of thinking that makes a bland game.

If you want frigates go KDF.
Couldnt agree more , just because one faction has it , doesnt mean the other should .
KDF has had carrier craft a lot longer than the feddies , its only right and proper they should be better at it
be content in the classes and ship types we have
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 25
06-14-2012, 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophlogimo
I am the only one who finds it ironic how the Klingon players on the forums are those who cry the most? :p
If someone is crying about something, one would think 'irony' would translate to 'They get all the goodies and have all the advantages! But they are complaining!'

That's clearly not the case, so what about it, exactly, is ironic?

Or is it some definition of 'irony' not found in conventional dictionaries?

Or do you actually think KDF ships are stronger and better than Fed ships, like the Gorn pay science ship with weaker shields than its Fed counterpart?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 26
06-14-2012, 09:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophlogimo
I am the only one who finds it ironic how the Klingon players on the forums are those who cry the most? :p.
Is that a joke???

The way i see it we feds are the biggest whiners and this thread proves that we keep wanting for more "shinies" .

if kdf whines are that bad then push cryptic to give them the love that we feds receive from them, their demand for fleshed out faction are more valid than this idea for more ships. Idc for new ships for content like 2800 (which is based on feds pov with swallow kdf tie in) and idc for anything for us feds, even though space stations for both faction is a plus and egc as well is fine but KDF needs some love as well.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 27
06-15-2012, 07:22 AM
Very well said. Signed.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 28
06-18-2012, 07:42 AM
I'd love to have a heavier version of the stalker fighters.

I dont like using the other fighter types on my atrox because they dont really match the look and feel of the carrier, so I'm stuck using stalkers. If we had some kind of Caitian heavy fighter or light escort as a hangar option, launching a single craft (max 2 per hangar) instead of three craft (max 6 per hangar), it'd at least give some variety.

I'd say give it tetryon beams instead of turrets, make it a bit larger but similar in design and color to the stalkers, and give it quantum torpedoes and some kind of special attack.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 29
06-18-2012, 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sophlogimo
I am the only one who finds it ironic how the Klingon players on the forums are those who cry the most? :p
Have a watch of this, Rom represents the STO KDF playerbase and Quark represents the STO Federation playerbase. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaMDvn6561U
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 30
06-18-2012, 11:09 AM
No.

It's concise and eloquent in it's simplicity and utter negation of what you are proposing.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:18 AM.