What about Curry class?
http://fc00.deviantart.net/fs71/i/20...y_Euderion.jpg

I think they need to do this since its very confusing if there is another carrier using the same fighters as you in the group, you can't tell if you need to launch more or not.

Fed Pets need an HP Decrease to match the KDF Pets first. Not Counting Bops and Frigates.

what are you talking about? Fed fighters have as much HP as Klingon fighters. the Shuttles have more HP than fighters becasue they are a stepping stone from the 3/wave fighters and the 1/wave bops/frigates.

Hi,

Please put 3 launch bays on all fed ships. No nerfs to the ships. Maybe a 10k hull buff.

Thanks Cryptic .

Love you bunches,
Your Feddie Cash Cow.

( now watch it happen )

To expand on this, there are several options for the name plates from none to only while targeted to always on. There is also an option to turn on a health bar under the name plate, which makes it easier to keep track of the health of your fighters. Unfortunately, each of these options are for "fighters and mines," so it turns them on for both your fighters and mines. There is not currently a way to turn it on for just one or the other.

note this topic is about interface changes, not ship or fighter changes themselves (plenty of pro and against threads out there for that) so please stick to the topic

As a carrier fan I support having an additional section detailing wings' status. Perhaps they could do it in the same fashion as the extra buttons for the EV suit, where it adds a little bump to the top of your action tray, in which the details could be displayed: Hangar1: 0/X ( Hanger2: 2/X if present)

This way it wouldnt clutter the interface too much more than it is now and it easily visible.

I would agree with the need for a way to tell how many fighters are deployed. They also need to work on the logic of how it replaces ships when you deploy new wings. Logically, if you have a single hanger, such as with the Armitage, deploying that hanger twice should replace all the fighters you have deployed. The same would be true of the Atrox if you had two different types of hangers equipped. Deploying from one hanger twice should replace both wings of that type of fighter. If you have both hangers of the Atrox deploying the same type of fighter, then deploying each hanger twice should replace all fighters deployed.

However, I have noted that I can deploy both wings from a single hanger (or single hanger type) or deploy both hangers twice when they have the same fighters, and I can still have damaged fighters deployed. That should not be happening. If I deploy a hanger twice, all the fighters spawned by that hanger should be at 100%, but that simply is not always the case.

Why do feds need more carriers? You already got more bloody ships than we do and odds are that you will see more new ones than we will in the future. Are you so damn greedy that you need matches to all of our ships we have and then need all of your own unique ships that we will never see variants of?

I'm not a Star Trek Loremaster or anything and i haven't watched all episodes yet. Buuuut i think We got more ships cause there is more stuff known and seen about Federation compared to whats been seen from klingon or read. Hey i'd love to see some Stronger ships on KDF and more ships. But as it is i just can't bring myself to play KDF space stuff. it's just so annoying being blasted apart so much cause my ship isn't as good as the ships i had on Fed. anyways that asside what's your opinion on the OP's Post?