Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 409
# 11
07-25-2012, 10:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkemisary420 View Post
let me start off by saying, you know nothing about me....you are 100000 miles past clueless and enroute to embarassing yourself....truth is i flew nothing BUT sci vessels most of my STO experiance...do i know how to fly them...yes i do....do i think they suck...yes i do....fact is i tried my hardest to like sci, as i am a voyager fan....but it is a useless ship class...it shouldn't even be in the game...it does not have the ability to kill the others do and it is boring to fly because of such reasons (to me)....if your idea of fun is running around healing ppl whilts having tickles wars with your enemy...you have the right class of ship...if you want to kill....pls pick ANYTHING else...i remember when sci was useful, now its just crap...the hordes of crybabies have nerfs it into boringness.....if i can kill in 3 seconds on my escort sci should have abilities that can do the same or similar....every time i fly sci i literally pass out at the keyboard....im not exaggerating in the slightest...aside from pretty graphics it is useless, the only sci based ships worth flying are the carriers because they have fighter to supplement dps....i fought a sci in my engi the other day 1 v 1...1 who swore he could toast anyone in his luna...i load up my engi on his marauder and let him have it....he throughly annoyed me for a half hour b4 i ultimately killed him..... and he never once dropped a shield or even had my hull below 98%.....TRANSLATION....U.S.E.L.E.S.S.
When you keep writing... in one long... incredibly unbroken sentence... moving from topic to topic... with unecessary ellipses everywhere... it's really hard to take your opinions seriously. If you can't master a very simple thing, such as how to present your thoughts clearly, it's reasonable to suspect that you're also bad at more difficult things, like playing video games.
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 42
# 12 sadly
07-25-2012, 12:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepantsparty View Post
When you keep writing... in one long... incredibly unbroken sentence... moving from topic to topic... with unecessary ellipses everywhere... it's really hard to take your opinions seriously. If you can't master a very simple thing, such as how to present your thoughts clearly, it's reasonable to suspect that you're also bad at more difficult things, like playing video games.

Sadly, I COULD make that perfect enough for any English Major, BUT I don't think you would be smart enough to understand it anyway....your the kind of person who is responsible for this game being geared towards the lowest common denominator.


OH GAWD, PLZ DEVS (QQ), MY CRAP BUILD CAN'T HANDLE *power A* PLZ NERF IT SO I DON'T HAVE TO RESPECT MY CHIITY BUILD


and cryptics reply: sure why not, we are only making the escorts even scarier while the whole time nerfing everything else...besides stupid people pay good money too *LOL*

when their reply should have been: I'm sorry..is the game too hard for you? I hear WOW is dumbed down for 10 years old with pride issues....maybe you should look there.... Star trek has bean and always will be SUPPORTED BY INTELLIGENT ADULTS.....to dumb down a game to make it playable by the intellectually challenged is just WRONG....like i said...there is WOW, who's player base is steadily dwindling away because its TOO easy and boring...made for 10 year olds.....
Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 409
# 13
07-25-2012, 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkemisary420 View Post
Sadly, I COULD make that perfect enough for any English Major, BUT I don't think you would be smart enough to understand it anyway....your the kind of person who is responsible for this game being geared towards the lowest common denominator.
*you're the kind of person
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 42
# 14 Lmao
07-25-2012, 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepantsparty View Post
*you're the kind of person


CLASSIC 10 YEAR OLD's REPLY.....so whats next?! I'm rubber your glue?


this is entertaining pls DO TELL.....
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 231
# 15
07-25-2012, 12:25 PM
Jesus guys, relax.

dark, you're not saying anything I didn't address: that science has been nerfed to high hell in relation to tac and engi, even with ships. Having said that, such a nerf doesn't mean that the weaver is inherently worse than the other science ships; actually, its console/torp/station setup allows it to be a very good tank, good balanced ship, or an incredible CC vessel. Thus, the weaver is indeed a good (and, imbalanced relatively speaking) vessel...it's just going to still be a bit lackluster in relation to other tank/dps roles. That's all I meant, and you haven't exactly disproven my point.

Weaver: Good.
Science: Nerfed.

I think we can all come to an agreement on this.
Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 409
# 16
07-25-2012, 12:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkemisary420 View Post
CLASSIC 10 YEAR OLD's REPLY.....so whats next?! I'm rubber your glue?


this is entertaining pls DO TELL.....
I'll pass on that one, I think I've proven my initial point.
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 42
# 17 fair enough
07-25-2012, 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mehen View Post
Jesus guys, relax.

dark, you're not saying anything I didn't address: that science has been nerfed to high hell in relation to tac and engi, even with ships. Having said that, such a nerf doesn't mean that the weaver is inherently worse than the other science ships; actually, its console/torp/station setup allows it to be a very good tank, good balanced ship, or an incredible CC vessel. Thus, the weaver is indeed a good (and, imbalanced relatively speaking) vessel...it's just going to still be a bit lackluster in relation to other tank/dps roles. That's all I meant, and you haven't exactly disproven my point.

Weaver: Good.
Science: Nerfed.

I think we can all come to an agreement on this.


i cannot argue that...my only real argument is sci power suck and blow simultaneously.

Because of that sci captains and sci ships aren't as appealing as other careers/ships, i think the ship looks awesome and the bridge is OMG...total PIMP....but as for offensive sci powers....cryptic dropped the ball in favor of crybaby *******....quite disappointing
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 749
# 18
07-25-2012, 01:27 PM
*Sigh*

Brandon, please lock this. It's obviously become a Flame War.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 207
# 19
07-25-2012, 02:47 PM
I think science powers still have their uses, even if they're nerfed hard. For example, a gravity well may not do much on its own, but when a ship is hardly moving, it takes a lot more damage from your tactical-escort-teammate. It can save an optional, or even an STF.

And if nothing else, then at least there's Starbase Blockade, where heals and snares are much more potent than dps (finally I might add).
If ARC becomes mandatory, I'll never buy ZEN again.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 207
# 20
07-25-2012, 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkemisary420 View Post
CLASSIC 10 YEAR OLD's REPLY.....so whats next?! I'm rubber your glue?
Well, the funny bit was that, in the very same post where you call somebody else 'dumb', you also lack the will to make your posts easier to read by making at least an attempt at proper spelling (which is often seen as a sign of lesser intelligence). Can you see the irony in that?

It's not that you MUST use proper spelling or punctuation marks...it's just that, when you're trying to convince someone else, it helps your cause if they can read your posts without getting a headache.
If ARC becomes mandatory, I'll never buy ZEN again.

Last edited by thibash; 07-25-2012 at 02:56 PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:09 PM.