Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 8,242
# 51
08-17-2012, 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meurik View Post
Your definition of how long time the Ambassador Class was seen on screen, is rather arbitrary, especially considering there was 1 TNG episode centered around an Ambassador Class (Yesterday's Enterprise).
If you had bothered to read my other posts in this thread you would see that my reply was only in response to the idea of "why an NX before an Ambassador?" Between those 2 ships the NX has far more precedent for being included first. As I said above, I have no explanation as to why the Ambassador isn't in the game. I was simply disputing the idea that the Ambassador is more important to Trek lore then the NX.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,018
# 52
08-17-2012, 01:50 PM
very doubtful we'll see any more 3 variant ships , only reason the oddy has that is because thats the flagship
12th Fleet
Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 8,242
# 53
08-17-2012, 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by paragon92518 View Post
I guess the Devs don't care about screen time. They just HATE the Ambassador Class period. Since the game is flooded with Cruisers already (by only Cryptic's own fault), I wouldn't mind seeing a Science Variant Zhukov, a Cruiser 1701-C, and perhaps a new 2409 variant. Like the Odyssey had 3 variants. Tac, Sci, and Eng.
The only thing I've seen Al say is that the Ambassador is hard to fit into their Tier system as the Excelsior is T3.5 and the Galaxy is T4. So they either make it T3.5, which doesn't explain why the Excelsior should be as good as the ship that followed it, or they make it T4, which doesn't explain why it's as good as the Galaxy. Either way it would also have a T5 Retrofit.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 211
# 54
08-17-2012, 02:06 PM
so what? it's just the ambassador class. big deal.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 8,242
# 55
08-17-2012, 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tehjonel View Post
so what? it's just the ambassador class. big deal.
Every ship's just a ship when you're not the one who wants it.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 182
# 56
08-17-2012, 03:28 PM
Because Jamjamz is busy making new ships and he already slung mud about the ambassador before the forum change.
Join Date. Dec 2007
The Original Novastar
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 864
# 57
08-17-2012, 03:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecosmic1 View Post
The only thing I've seen Al say is that the Ambassador is hard to fit into their Tier system as the Excelsior is T3.5 and the Galaxy is T4. So they either make it T3.5, which doesn't explain why the Excelsior should be as good as the ship that followed it, or they make it T4, which doesn't explain why it's as good as the Galaxy. Either way it would also have a T5 Retrofit.
Easy solution. Just make it T3.75 I don't think the Ambassador will every be realized. We should get used to it.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 131
# 58
08-17-2012, 03:42 PM
Moar escorts IMO.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 622
# 59
08-17-2012, 05:49 PM
Atrox? Armitage? Regent? Play with those toys and eat your peas.
All cloaks should be canon.
Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 267
# 60
08-17-2012, 09:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloctoad View Post
Atrox? Armitage? Regent? Play with those toys and eat your peas.
Kind of would like to see more Sci ships (if Sci didn't currently suck after they nerfed it to death)...would like to see a few more Escorts yes...but....I'd like to see "Hybrid" ships. I'm getting sick of Sci, Cruiser, or Escort. It would be nice to see some ships that aren't clearly defined in any specific category to break up this ship virtual-clone madness.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:27 AM.