Why further ruin James Bond franchise by putting out anything more with the new "James bond"? The again I <3 Sir Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan 007s. Sean Connery was meh, a tad bit old looking for the part even then. Daniel Craig was too brutish looking.
Heir to the high pony of holier than thou, Guardian of the Sacred Mallet of Thwarting, and giver of Baptismal raspberries since 02/02/2010
Moonraker - Not good
On Her Majesty's Secret Service. - cant ever remeber anyone (i know) liking it
Goldfinger - Not that bad
Licence to Kill - Not good
Die Another Day - Not bad
Wierd combination of games to slap into one game if you ask me :/
As for the Daniel Craig i kinda agree that he seems a bit brutish and not -BOND-, but hey people of this (or younger however you wanna call it) generation have thier bond, besides, they cant really use the original actors right? bond is ageless if you get me, :p
Though i do remeber being disappointed when the goldeneye remake came out and we got Craig instead of Brosnan
Guess how expensive your video game would be if the developers had to license the physical appearances/voices of Connery, Lazenby, Moore, Brosnan, and Dalton? They probably already have a licensing arangement in place with Craig since he is the current Bond.
Yeah. It would be so expensive that they wouldn't make the game at all.
If they did, no one would spend the $ to buy it. Unless it came with an actual, real Bond girl to fluff you while you played the most expensive Bond game ever made.