Screen shot it then, something is not right. Regen rates have always been effected by shield modifier of the ship.

http://www.stowiki.org/Screen_shot

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8k7...5XTGJBOEk/edit Dread Screenshot

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8k7...xTaXZoVlU/edit Nebula Screenshot

Clearly showing a difference in regeneration rates.

Yerp will do when I get home.

Another thing that might be causing your issue is the omega passive. It was bugged in the past and might still be bugging up the shield regen display but I have no clue just a possibility.

Possibly, but I have heard that it is currently disabled. And I am inclined to believe the source.

I understood the ship's shield modifier affect only the capacity of any shield array you equip....

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/202/odysseyt.jpg/

Odyssey Tactical Cruiser. Shield mod 1.15

Regen Rate: 167.3/6

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...ltcruiser.jpg/

Assault Cruiser. Shield mod 1.0

Regen Rate: 145.5/6

I stand corrected.

If you've got the shield regen passive, and the above numbers are what you're seeing, then said passive is either not showing it's effects on the tooltip, or is indeed offline.

Considering 9 points in shield emitters gives you a ~30% shield regen boost (which is shown by those pictures), and the passive is supposed to add on at least 250 per shield facing, only having those tiny numbers as shield regen (aka under 250 per facing) means it's probably the case and the passive is indeed disabled.

I think I read something about the Omega shield regen passive being disabled on the PvP forums as well. I wonder what the reaction would be if it was indeeed disabled and it became well known lol. People would be outraged, but probably not surprised.

Well due to the massive outrage at it's original strength, followed by the massive outrage at it's nerf, I think they are going to keep it disabled until they can either reach a middle ground or decide which one to go with.

Sufficed to say, I am still able to tank pretty well in ESTFs with my cruisers even without the passive, but it was helpful.