> > > Hi Captains! The team continues to investigate an issue where some players may be stuck on a loading screen. We appreciate your continued patience! < < <
Jolan tru Captain!
Welcome to Legacy of Romulus!
If you have purchased a Legacy or Starter Pack, please see this thread for instructions on how to claim your items in-game. (Please see the yellow text in the linked thread for instructions on creating a Reman.) (Not seeing your pack in-game? Please see the lime-green text in the linked thread above for information.)
If you have additional questions about the Legacy or Starter pack, please read this FAQ.
Thanks SO MUCH for all your support, and we'll see you in-game!
- The Star Trek Online Team
***Resolved Issues***
"Login failed for unknown reason" error
Missing additional character slot for current/ lapsed Gold Members
Slow patching in the launcher
A bug that involved Romulan Liberated Borg captains and their skills once they chose an ally
The company will set the price based on the best return.
There will be a minimum price which will cover the costs.
There will be a maximum price that would not sell well.
In between these two is a sweet spot, the best price the market can stand with the best return based on the metrics of previous purchases.
They may indeed sell more ships at a lower price but there will be a price point whereby they sell the maximum number of ships to the maximum number of people. This is the price they currently use.
Therefore the price is unlikely to change unless market forces dictate a change. There will always be those that can't afford something and state if you lower the price I would buy it, but if they did that they would lose money because they are already selling the maximum number they can and the few extra purchases at a lower price would not make up for the less purchases at a higher price.
I would agree that selling ship packs for 45 euros is to expensive unless it is an elite item wich is pretty much alitle bit better than any other ship of its class. However I do think what the developers are doing letting all high end ships (fleet and z-store) range from about 193 euros to 45 (2000 zen to 5000 zen) is not the best solution. Considering most people probobly end up changing their minds changing ships every now and then and just 3 ship changes will be about 60 euros that's pretty expensive - not too mention if you have toon. Also keep in mind that the digital product we are buying is fairly quickly and easy to develop compared to other large expansion packs or entire games that costs the same. Ofcourse this can't change because the price have already been set to this level for this type of items. However I would like them to let other new contentthat would eventually come into the game like say zen store consoles or set's too be much cheaper. This way the price is more in line with the work put into a few very small items.
Also a very important note that the developers schould notice is that people really wants "everything" so selling cheaper zen store items would led alot more to buy them because their affordable but people that are willing to dump alot of cash into the game (me included) will dump it into the game anyways because they want to have all the new shiny stuff you guys developes
and those appear to be a ST micro machine equivlent of a lockbox item as both said they were rare items,so if a collector really wanted them i bet they would pay the cash to get one.
my point being: People who buy these crappy old plastic things for such pricetags are the same people that pay such amounts for a few Polygons and Textures and you dont even need to write "rare" on it. (there is nothing rare about that Bird of Prey).
That's the Playerbase we are all dealing with here.
I don't even blame Cryptic for the prices, i blame the players who pay for it, if i had a thing going like that and noticed that i could ask whatever price i want and people would buy anyway, i'd do the same thing.
I've been here since the second week of Beta.
Not Closed Beta. Beta Testing.
I remember when Klingon play had to be unlocked, and it was a PvP only faction and had to grind my way to Lt. General by beating everyone around me to a bloody pulp (it was a simpler time).
I remember when tricorders had a little glow light on them.
I remember the Borg before they could adapt.
I remember the first time a dev commented on a post of mine (it was about the Dyson sphere).
And I've never made any such claims because making such claims is foolish.
I'd have thought someone that had been here all this time (the same length of time as myself for the record) would have been quite familiar with the creeping monetization of everything in this game - the latest nerfs to Dilithium earning and the corresponding increase in Dilithium costs being a glaring example - but for some reason you choose to ignore it. That's your right of course as it is mine to speculate where next Cryptic/PWE will look to squeeze money from us (as they're not done yet).
Quote:
Originally Posted by sorceror01
Do I make reasonable assumptions or educated estimations? I like to think so, but I this does not preclude the fact that I can be proven wrong at any time because the STO devs have Captain's Prerogative: anything at any time can be subject to changes. They've said as much, and it says as much in the Terms of Service all players agreed to before playing the game.
And frankly, the prices of ships has only really significantly changed when the game fully converted to Zen. Rounded things out, but they've stayed at relatively similar prices.
And honestly, I'm not gonna "owe" you anything, because I am more confident in my ability to observe patterns and make reasonable predictions than I am of ill-informed, heat of the moment doom calling.
And what you regard as ill-informed, heat of the moment doom calling I see more as an inevitable progression of the current chain of decision making underpinning the game. Time will tell which of us was 'right'. In the meantime, I'll continue to pay Cryptic what I feel is a reasonable price for services offered which at the moment is zero. They have the means to change that but with people such as yourself around, little incentive it seems.
The company will set the price based on the best return.
There will be a minimum price which will cover the costs.
There will be a maximum price that would not sell well.
In between these two is a sweet spot, the best price the market can stand with the best return based on the metrics of previous purchases.
They may indeed sell more ships at a lower price but there will be a price point whereby they sell the maximum number of ships to the maximum number of people. This is the price they currently use.
Therefore the price is unlikely to change unless market forces dictate a change. There will always be those that can't afford something and state if you lower the price I would buy it, but if they did that they would lose money because they are already selling the maximum number they can and the few extra purchases at a lower price would not make up for the less purchases at a higher price.
Sales 101
Sales 101 indeed.
But you're talking about a company that screwed up so badly with the Dilithium changes in Season 7 that they've had to change direction. There's little-to-no business sense at work here - just a desire to recoup maximum return for minimum outlay.
I myself have been here since open beta as a lifer(my main, borg engineer still uses the crash test tribble title from s1 test),im just not using the lifer forum tags,i dont know if i should believe stahl when he says the game is really profitable atm and STO has a bright future or not but since ive been here as long as i have and my experience with other games/companies i know what to expect.funny thing is if doomsayers in this thread remember ppl have been doomsaying since launch and look where we are at now.
I myself have been here since open beta as a lifer(my main, borg engineer still uses the crash test tribble title from s1 test),im just not using the lifer forum tags,i dont know if i should believe stahl when he says the game is really profitable atm and STO has a bright future or not but since ive been here as long as i have and my experience with other games/companies i know what to expect.funny thing is if doomsayers in this thread remember ppl have been doomsaying since launch and look where we are at now.
And in response I'd ask exactly where the 'doom-sayers' are in this thread? I merely remarked that prices are currently too high for me to consider purchasing what Cryptic is offering. I also predicted that at some point we'd see $99 ships (or bundles) in the C-Store which to me seems a logical progression of the increasing monetization of the game.
[quote=weylandjuarez;6608881] I also predicted that at some point we'd see $99 ships (or bundles) in the C-Store which to me seems a logical progression of the increasing monetization of the game.
QUOTE]
It is not logical to charge more than the market can stand. If $99 ships will sell better than $50 ships interms of overall profit then yes they will be charged accordingly. There is no evidence to suggest that price point is on the horizon at all.
And what you regard as ill-informed, heat of the moment doom calling I see more as an inevitable progression of the current chain of decision making underpinning the game.
So, doom calling. Right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by weylandjuarez
Time will tell which of us was 'right'.
You're still not getting it, so I'll be plainer:
I'm not trying to get into a whole, "I'm right, you're wrong" kind of deal. Time will only tell what it will tell, and I am completely accepting of that, because I am being objective and realistic.
You, and plenty of other people in this thread, are not. You are basing your arguments and opinions on pretty much nothing substantial.
Meanwhile I, and a handful of other people in this thread, are trying to be reasonable and rational about things. Which is being not-so-kindly ignored or downplayed. Thanks.
I don't care either way.
And honestly, I'd rather play the game that Cryptic has than the game you, and others like you, are.
(which in case you missed it, is doom speaking and hyperbolic nonsense.)
Now if you'll excuse me, I have a video game to play.
And in response I'd ask exactly where the 'doom-sayers' are in this thread? I merely remarked that prices are currently too high for me to consider purchasing what Cryptic is offering. I also predicted that at some point we'd see $99 ships (or bundles) in the C-Store which to me seems a logical progression of the increasing monetization of the game.
I suppose you think the prices will get cheaper?
I would like to point out that you said right b4 cryptic shuts down it would offer $99 ships,and no i dont think they will get cheaper,unless you look at a quickie sell like the steamrunner pack for $10.i just dont see their price system changing much.the bug ship is how they mooch money when that attach it to something.the c-store ships are comparable in price to what other games offer.like my reference to WoT as similar thread had shown up there at some point from the f2p babies who wanted the benefit of "gold" tanks without paying for them.due to the prices of some of the tanks in that game being $50 for a SINGLE tank. Ppl QQed but look where WoT is now the game gets reliable patches every month with new maps/tech trees etc cause of those of us who wanted more out of the game. (in that game the term is wallet warrior or paypal paratrooper btw rofl)
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. - Thomas Jefferson
Last edited by mastergenera1; 11-15-2012 at 08:52 AM.