with the new league going on, and some fire under that belly, and boot camp getting started... i wanted to reach out to the readers, not so much the posters.... and get some info flowing.....
there are such great threads if you just search for them. mav's cruiser build threads, kai's sci threads..... naz's threads... they all give great info, but i really want to start off with the basics here.
in pvp, rule #1, stay alive.
1 person dies, and you will see the rest follow quickly, because of pure numbers game. to defeat this everyone should start off their builds running 2 copies of epts, and 2 tac teams. or max that out however you can based on layout. this is raw defense folks, its the base. you can pull away from this once you have learned the system, but until then, run it.
rule #2, play your class.
scis....your main weapon is your subnuke/scan combo. it needs to be full aux. find a way to work it in. you need your front 45 on a target to get the nuke in, so... play in an agile ship.
tacs, its all about apa for you, and how you can roll in the go down fighting... 4 dual heavy cannons and rapid fire get the job done the best right now, start off there before you go to torps or beam overloads. you need timing and situational awareness to pull those off right now. get your piloting and distance run times nailed using 4 DHC before moving forward with anything else.
engies. im going to say this softly (bieber and era hold your tongue) damage is not your concern. keeping your escorts and scis alive is. you need extends, and you need team heals. ectends, plus he1, tss2, goes a long way in a fight.... get good with those before thinking about damage.
rule #3, look at your team's buff bars
whether in voice comm or just pugging it, if you look at the 3 paragraphs above, a team dynamic should be clear to you. spike damage on the guy being subnuked, heal the guy being killed. what you should do in any ship for any situation, is be aware of what your teammates are running, and when.
the rest, is piloting, and situational awareness my friends.
so, get out there, and have fun killing bad guys.
but start with the basics....... play your role in battle.
And try not to across in my torp/mine boat
Just kiddin, nice thread, indeed, when u try to follow your teammates buffs/debuffs u can save him, e.g. if u are sci and your team mate is nuked, send him ST etc. etc..
Those five abilities are all that separate each of the Careers in Space. It's important to look at those, in any discussion about a player playing their class (imho).
Tactical is obvious. It's a damage career/class. Whether they're buffing their own damage, the teams damage, or making the target less resistant to damage - they're about damage. Their damage potential in any ship is going to be higher than the other two careers/classes whether in PvE or PvP.
I'm going to skip Engineer for a moment to look at Science. Science is a bag of tricks, eh? Buffs and Debuffs - they're weakening the enemy and strengthening the team. It's the middle career/class between the offensive and the defensive. With SNB's 90 degree arc, they're going to want to be in a ship where they can get the target in that arc. They bring some goodies for the team whether in PvE or PvP.
Engineer. Engineer. Engineer. Engineer's broken in my opinion. There's no other way to state it (politely) without saying that they're broken. We have Tac buffing the offense. We have Sci buffing offense/defense. We have Eng buffing defense. BUT - we don't. We have Eng buffing their own defense, but they're not buffing the team defense.
The Engineer comes off looking like a tank (in Space - on Ground, it's a different story entirely). With no need for a tank in PvP, slap them in a cruiser/Recluse and you've got your healer. But you're no longer really playing the class - you're playing the boat now. The Engineer's just "tankier" in that boat than a Tac or a Sci would be.
You could put a Tac in a healing boat. They'll be able to heal just as well as the Eng. They'll do more damage than the Eng while they're at it as well. The Tac in a healboat would bring more to the team than an Eng in a healboat would... except the Tac's going to be squishier than the Eng. So that healboat will pop. AND - the Tac loses potential.
You could put a Sci in a healing boat. They'll be able to heal just as well as the Eng. They'll do more damage than the Eng while they're at it as well. The Sci in a healboat would bring more to the team than an Eng in a healboat would... except the Sci's going to be squishier than the Eng. So that healboat will pop. AND - the Sci loses potential.
There's some play between putting a Tac in a Sciboat or a Sci in a Tacboat. That play does not exist for putting the Eng in a Sciboat or a Tacboat (outside of the Sciboats/Specials that sport the Eng BOFF layouts).
So given the nature of Eng in space, what Tac or Sci would lose (as well as being squishier while doing it) - the Eng is the healer (because there's no need for a tank).
Cryptic needs to fix Engineers. They should be more like they are on the ground while in space. Much like the Sci brings a mix of offensive and defensive support; the Eng should bring a mix of defensive and offensive support (or even defensive support).
The forums is the place to address this issue with Cryptic. Sending them feedback is the way to address the issues with Engineers in Space...
...making your team suffer because you want to ignore the way Cryptic has botched the Engineer and play your way...
...well, that fits in with the broken and selfish nature of Cryptic's Engineers in Space I guess.
So definitely make sure to offer feedback every chance you get to Cryptic about how Engineers are broken - but do it on the forums - or do it via feedback to customer service - etc, etc, etc.
If you're going to play an Engineer with the way it currently is, then play the Engineer as it currently is - you're going to be the "tanky healer" - you're not going to be the debuffer nor the damage dealer. Unlike Tac or Sci, you're going to be incomplete without the right ship.
It sucks... but that's STO (as it currently stands).
I fly my Eng/Vesta (loaded up to heal like a mofo) like an oversized Tac/Defiant :p
Originally Posted by voporak
PvP'rs: 0, Devs: 1
If any dev guy reads this for whatever reason, let me just ask a question... Is this what you (collectively) wanted? To see your most loyal fans, who were willing to offer help, who were wanting to improve the decency of a basic aspect of the game, completely stamped out? Is this what you wanted?
Always weapons on auto fire, a good set of defensive and offensive keybinds makes life easier, learning the cooldown of every ability and the shared and global cooldowns is extremely important, first choose your play style with the best weapons and skills then the build and not the opposite, fire weapons according to the correct range to maximize the damage and not to lose power too soon, managing the power levels to weapons, engines, shields and auxiliary is essential in conjunction with a smart use of the batteries.
have fun kill bad guys (the evil Klinguns, of course, no doubt about it)
This is a real Starfleet Cruiser, the awesome Adm. Marcus Vengeance! Stol Fed Cruisers suck!
Something I think I want to chime in on about Engineers..
I flew an Engi/Escort for a loong time before the Skill change..
Honestly some where in the Skill change, something changed for Engineers.
Originally they could deal damage and absorb damage quite well. Making them a good fit for any ship. Escorts was nice because they could help the Escort Survive longer and their powers could help bring out some damage potential.
But all that changed when they tweeked the skill trees. Now Tacs Deal Superior Damage (As they should) Scis do their Debuff/All hail the all mighty Sub Nuc..
Engi..something changed.. I don't know if maybe there isn't enough skill interaction with their abilities. If perhaps their powers really were the way they are now, but we never noticed it before because perhaps the other classes weren't performing as well as they should have. Or if Engi really does just need to be given some form of a buff.
The skill tree change did bring about improvements and ease of managing and improving defensive Boff skills while the Miracle worker isn't quite as useful as it used to be (Remember when it used to almost heal you to full all the time if you had those skills maxed?)
As a suggestion, perhaps the following should be done for Engineers to improve their capabilites while in Space. Note some of the suggestions may be slightly Biased in appearance, but they are not ment to be.
1: Give EPS a small innate universal buff for weapon Damage, Shield resistance, Speed, and Stealth sight for each Power level that goes above 100. If it would go above 125 then perhaps double said bonus. (For example if it's just +5 at 100, if it gives more then 125 it would go to +10) This would also give reasons to run Powers in conjunction with it, like Energy Siphon, Aux to Battery, or other less used Emergency Power to Bridge officer powers. This would also aid other team mates and give a new way to provide buffs for other players based on what their power settings are at when EPS is applied.
2: Increase Miracle Worker's heal by another 15%, or Perhaps make the Shield heal based on Shield power level and the hull heal based on Aux Power level and have it Scale based on those making it useful to use Miracle Worker while under EPS for example.
3: Perhaps allow Engineering Fleet to scale it's resistance buff along side points spent in either Hull Plating, Armor Reinforcements, or Starship Threat control. The more in which ever skills would be linked, the higher the resistance bonus could get, but still keeping Team play in mind of course.. We don't want to introduce 5 man Engi teams using Rolling Engineering Fleets and removing their shields to prove they don't need them of course.
Those are just off the top of my head. And yet more suggestions that come from me when I'm tired. Really should probably stop coming around here so late.. lol.
You think that your beta test was bad?
Think about this: American Football has been in open beta for 144 years. ~Kotaku
I would also like to interject that the classic Engineering ship, the cruiser, has no innate advantages to anything besides Rule #1: "Protect Thyself".
You can call them healboats, but the only characteristic they have that permits them to be a healboat is the fact that they have more and higher level Engineering bridge stations. ALL of a cruiser's ability to protect other ships comes ONLY from BO's.
And the fact is that there aren't that many Engineering powers that are useful on allies. You can "double up" with I, II, and III versions but you still have shared cooldown to deal with.
So to sum it up, you have a "selfish" class -- the Engineer, in a "selfish" ship -- the Cruiser. I'm not saying they aren't useful in PvP and team PvE, but they aren't really optimized for the role they're being forced into.
Volunteer Community Moderator for the Star Trek Online forums -- My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. If you wish to speak to someone on the community team, file a "forums and website" support ticket here, as we are not able to respond to PMs regarding moderation inquiries. Link: How to PM - Twitter @STOMod_Bluegeek