Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 181
01-21-2013, 11:19 PM
I think this thread should more about what the ambassador SHOULD NOT be...and that is simple...it should not be better as Galaxy-R. I admit, will be hell of work, to do even worse ship than the STO famous failaxy.
Captain
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 537
# 182
01-21-2013, 11:42 PM
I thought we covered most of it? Starting with the 2 lt cmd boff man.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,052
# 183
01-22-2013, 02:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalnar83 View Post
I think this thread should more about what the ambassador SHOULD NOT be...and that is simple...it should not be better as Galaxy-R. I admit, will be hell of work, to do even worse ship than the STO famous failaxy.
And this is where we're stuck at an impasse: an Ambassador-R (T5 incarnation) should be better than the Excelsior-R and weaker than the Galaxy-R...except that the game is rigged since the Excelsior-R is already stronger than the Galaxy-R.
Captain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,591
# 184
01-22-2013, 03:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterde3 View Post
And this is where we're stuck at an impasse: an Ambassador-R (T5 incarnation) should be better than the Excelsior-R and weaker than the Galaxy-R...except that the game is rigged since the Excelsior-R is already stronger than the Galaxy-R.
Which is why my idea of just trashing the whole Ambassador BS and making a new ship is best out of all of them
It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once.
Why the Devs can't make PvE content harder. <--- DR proved me wrong!
Ensign
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 19
# 185
01-22-2013, 03:01 AM
or just forget about the Galaxy completely, it is useless.
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 186
01-22-2013, 03:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hereticknight085 View Post
Which is why my idea of just trashing the whole Ambassador BS and making a new ship is best out of all of them
That must be the first time I agree about something you have said.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 750
# 187
01-22-2013, 03:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vintage1gamer View Post
or just forget about the Galaxy completely, it is useless.
Forgetting about the Galaxy is the surest way to allow Cryptic to keep it useless.
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 188
01-22-2013, 03:19 AM
Well I could imagine, changing galaxy, to better reflect it's status, and add ambassador, but no way in current situation.

Proposal:

Give Fleet Galaxy-R, ensign universal, and give it sensor analysis


Add Fleet Ambassdor, that has lt.cmd science, no universal, and no sensor analysis and is basically the science copy of excelsior stat-wise.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,052
# 189
01-22-2013, 03:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hereticknight085 View Post
Which is why my idea of just trashing the whole Ambassador BS and making a new ship is best out of all of them
Not sure I agree with that, it would not solve two problems:
the absence of the Ambassador and the horrific performance of the Galaxy-R.
I think it would be better if Cryptic simply made the Galaxy-R not s**k any more.
Rihannsu
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 948
# 190
01-22-2013, 09:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xigbarg View Post
I thought we covered most of it? Starting with the 2 lt cmd boff man.
No. My boff slots are sufficient. Yours are overpowering.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:42 PM.