Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 1 Venture Skin for Nebula?
01-24-2013, 07:29 AM
What about this one? I think it would be gorgeous addition for a lovely ship.
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 535
# 2
01-24-2013, 08:00 AM
The Venture skin is broken. Do you still want it?
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,051
# 3
01-24-2013, 09:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aethon3050 View Post
The Venture skin is broken. Do you still want it?
I don't have one, but I'm curiuous what's up...screenies please.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,249
# 4
01-24-2013, 10:28 AM
Nebula is one of my favourite ship classes, so I would welcome more components for it; though, personally, I'd rather they used the upcoming Ambassador class as the basis for a new variant (I really want some classic Fed ship shapes on my Neb; circular saucer, cylindrical(ish) hull, etc).
Exploration suggestions thread - give it a read

BTW, you'd pronounce it 'Cap'n Manks'

I protest the removal of exploration clusters
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,085
# 5
01-24-2013, 12:03 PM
I wouldn't mind the thicker saucer rim and different looking secondary hull from the studio shooting model myself: Nebula 1 and Nebula 2
---------------------------------------------------
U.S.S. Endeavour NCC-91771 - Nebula-class
Commanding Officer: Captain Pyotr Ramonovich Amosov
Dedication Plaque: "Leave nothing unattempted" - James Cook
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 319
# 6
01-24-2013, 07:47 PM
The bottom of the Saucer has about a quarter of the windows missing, the saucer doesn't quite meet the neck very well, and if you angle your camera right you can see through between the pylons and nacelles.

The Neck and nacelles would be no problem for a Nebula - the neck connector would be replaced by the sensor tower and the pylons/nacelles would be attached differently. Still - the windows are painful to see.
Lieutenant
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 36
# 7
01-24-2013, 08:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by misterde3 View Post
I don't have one, but I'm curiuous what's up...screenies please.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jer5488 View Post
The bottom of the Saucer has about a quarter of the windows missing, the saucer doesn't quite meet the neck very well, and if you angle your camera right you can see through between the pylons and nacelles.

The Neck and nacelles would be no problem for a Nebula - the neck connector would be replaced by the sensor tower and the pylons/nacelles would be attached differently. Still - the windows are painful to see.
Oh hell, you're right. How did I never notice that.
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 8
01-25-2013, 12:02 AM
Damn, did not notice the problem with Venture skin. Pff for such a price, they better fix it, especially if the Exploration cruisers suck otherwise statwise.
Captain
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 536
# 9
01-25-2013, 12:52 AM
Would be nice to have that burn your eyes out white for an option. Might as well give it a more 25th century look too.
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,471
# 10
01-25-2013, 03:05 PM
I've seen the windows missing on the Venture skin, but what was the other problem?

If Cryptic fixes the Venture skin, along with other major issues with other ships, I'm all for a Venture version of the Nebula.

stardestroyer001, Admiral, Explorers Fury PvE/PvP Fleet | Retired PvP Player
My Useful List of STO Forum Threads, Ship Builds & More!
It's about time. DEVS NEED ACCOUNTABILITY.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 AM.