Empire Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,202
# 11
01-01-2013, 03:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kamiyama317 View Post
I personally don't care if it can mount DHC's or not. And 1 Hangar is fine.

A turn rate of 7 or 8 makes it perform on par with other cruisers, such as the Advanced Heavy Cruiser.

I changed the BO layout and I added approximations for crew and hull, so I wouldn't care if they added or removed a little bit there to make it balanced. Also I dropped the shield modifier down to a flat 1.0.
Without DHCs it's fine. But the BO layout isn't. You need at least one enseign, and such a ship doesn't need a LtCmdr tac, especially if you have pets. Lt Tac + ensign eng or sci would be better.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 887
# 12
01-01-2013, 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diogene0 View Post
Without DHCs it's fine. But the BO layout isn't. You need at least one enseign, and such a ship doesn't need a LtCmdr tac, especially if you have pets. Lt Tac + ensign eng or sci would be better.
The Atrox doesn't have any ensigns. I actually borrowed this BO layout idea from the Atrox (different types, but same ranks).
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,202
# 13
01-01-2013, 04:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kamiyama317 View Post
The Atrox doesn't have any ensigns. I actually borrowed this BO layout idea from the Atrox (different types, but same ranks).
But an atrox has 6 weapon slots. And no ltcmdr tac. Your ship has 8 beams, and a ltcmdr would make this cruiser really superior to a galor or a d'kora with such a turnrate, pets and DPS. The uniqueness of the galor comes from its ability to use FAW III. Your ship could use FAW III AND pets at the same time (= torp spam). The galor would be utter garbage.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 887
# 14
01-01-2013, 05:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by diogene0 View Post
But an atrox has 6 weapon slots. And no ltcmdr tac. Your ship has 8 beams, and a ltcmdr would make this cruiser really superior to a galor or a d'kora with such a turnrate, pets and DPS. The uniqueness of the galor comes from its ability to use FAW III. Your ship could use FAW III AND pets at the same time (= torp spam). The galor would be utter garbage.
I love this BO layout though but I can understand where you're coming from. I didn't notice it was so similar to the Galor until you mentioned it and I took a look.

Like virusdancer mentioned, it's probably going to be a tac/sci carrier anyway.

Post what you would like it to be. I'm probably way off the mark anyway, so tell me what you would like to see!
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:27 AM.