Captain
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,465
# 21
01-15-2013, 07:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by reginamala78 View Post
Surprised nobody has mentioned the Saber-class.
If I'm not mistaken, a Saber is supposed to be about 30% larger than a Defiant
Ensign
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 11
# 22
01-15-2013, 09:40 AM
We can solve that and many another problems.... we can set warp nacelles to ESD and give it to any players (by no less 100.000 Zen points). This way, a "federation ship" can use several and very bigger pets.

Of course that is a joke

Exist many ship can take the role of pets, saber class and aquarius are a better option than defiant class (too powerfull... or at least must be).

Another option is make an Command fleet cruiser that can call ships from Star Fleet (as a carrier launch their fighters).

Or even that Command option can be a console (on DS9 we see defiant flanked by two miranda sub-classes as escorts); this console can add commands ui and have the ussual 3 min CD.

Last edited by timberjac; 01-15-2013 at 09:45 AM.
Rihannsu
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 239
# 23
01-15-2013, 10:07 AM
Thought of another idea actually. Make a new Caitian skin for the playable Aquarius, and stick ships with that skin in the Atrox as its frigate pet if there must be one.

But then what to do with the Ho'sus... there's already a fleet B'rel so we can't merge it into that.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 729
# 24
01-15-2013, 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordgyor View Post
Just out of curiousity does anyone think the defiant would make a good hangar pet say for the Atrox?

The Defiant could easily fit on the Atrox, the Defiant is small. Not sure if it could fit on a Escort Carrier though.
I think it should be the opposite...The Atrox is as useless as a bucket in empty space. Would be nice if the Atrox could fit as a hangar for the defiant instead

Just kidding... since the comparison is beyond comprehension....this carrier is useless as the Dread cruiser and should be scrapped off for metal instead IMO

Devs need to come up with better FED carriers.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,995
# 25
01-16-2013, 01:48 PM
Ey
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraghul2000 View Post
Why would a carrier carry and launch a Defiant class ship? It's the same issue with B'rel Birds of Prey which doesn't make sense being on a carrier.

You place ship, boats and aircraft on a carrier because they don't have the range or speed a carrier has as well as not being able to support, refuel or rearm themselves. Both the Defiant and the B'rel have the capability to do so. So why waste room on a carrier for ships that can just fly next to it without any limitations?

While I'd love to see a bit more sturdier Fed carrier pets, I'd really hate if they turned out to be Defiants.

An Atrox-only, unique caitian-design, heavy carrier pet would be the better alternative.
Federation ships do need fuel from time to time.

The defiants could be used for medium range missions instead of flying over the whole ship therefore saving fuel and supplies and extending the long range capability of the Jupiter or Atrox.

. This is on top of the fact the defiant is more powerful and durable than the Aquarius. Adding 1 or 2 defiants to the inventory increases combat and non combat effectiveness.

Last edited by edalgo; 01-16-2013 at 01:55 PM.
Survivor of Romulus
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 374
# 26
01-16-2013, 02:32 PM
Non cloaking,
Cannon Rapid Fire II
Torp High Yield I

and getting 1 per hangar bay when launched and only being able to support ONLY 1 per hangar bay would make this something I would agree to... but still the idea is a bit far fetched and I want to point out that the Defiant scale makes it so large as to not be something that could be carried by another ship UNLESS they retooled the size of the ship (Atrox) Carrier
Major Xi'Zzin
I.R.W. Raptor's Claw
Storm Eagle Class Warbird Fleet Ha'feh
I have never trusted humans, and I never will
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,434
# 27
01-17-2013, 07:20 AM
Speaking of scale, Danubes look like they'd smash into both the nacelles of my Vesta when they launch, heh.

"Don't let them promote you. Don't let them transfer you. Don't let them do anything that takes you off the bridge of that ship, because while you're there... you can make a difference." - James T. Kirk
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,628
# 28
01-17-2013, 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by edalgo View Post
Federation ships do need fuel from time to time.
No, they dont.

They use matter/anti-matter reactors, they dont need to resupply for a long time.
Commander
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 460
# 29
01-17-2013, 03:03 PM
Fuel supply and range veries alot between ship times. A defiant isn't going to have the range of a Cruiser.

Cruisers have bigger warp cores and more storage space, some Science Ships are designed for long term missions as well, carrier and normal science ships, and enigeering aligned Escorts next and finally tac and science escorts.

On the Klingon side Flight Deck Cruisers, Battle Cruisers, Carriers and Fleet Support Ships, Naus Destroyers, Raptors, and BoPs for Range.
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:28 AM.