You're grasping at straws at this point. Those are clearly screen caps of the ship just before jumping to warp. Forward a few frames to show the whole rainbow of colors. You go right on telling other people that they don't know what they are looking at though if that's what floats your boat.

Bottom line is, you're wrong in saying any Trek fan would not see that as a Starfleet ship. As a Trek fan, I (and others who have replied) see a Federation/Starfleet influence in the design the OP posted.

Confirmed troll, Screenshot 3 proves you wrong.

Goodday sir.

Proving someone wrong is not trolling. Nice try though.

...Why are y'all arguing about blue nacelle glows again?

If you proved him wrong why did you ignore Screenshot 3, which clearly shows a blue glue, without warp being involved?

I don't really care about glow/no glow to be honest. I've watched Star Trek since 1968 and there was never any blue glow on the ship when I was watching it.

This is the point I am disagreeing with.

There have been several Trek fans who replied to this post who said they see it as a Federation ship, so his statement is wrong. Rather than agreeing to disagree, he turned the conversation toward whether or not there is a glow or not on remastered versions of the films etc. He can try deflecting the conversation with ad hominems, appeals to ignorance, straw man and slippery slope fallacies all he likes. Bottom line is saying Trek fans would not see the ship as anything other than Vulcan is not correct and has been proven, regardless of warp glow or not.