Commander
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 489
# 41
01-19-2013, 04:02 PM
Now you guys are just over reacting.
Community Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 464
# 42
01-19-2013, 04:07 PM
Love this alternate design, definitely agree, it would make a great 25th century dreadnought! Add an additional 3rd nacelle on the centre aft, dorsal engineering section, a Phaser Spinal Lance to the centre forward, ventral saucer section and a standard cloaking device with a science focused BOff station set up. Resulting in all good things... Right?
Twitter: @STO_Alecto | Voluntary Community Moderator for the Star Trek Online forums | Ferasan Shadow Force
My views may not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. If you wish to speak to someone on the community team, file a "forums and website" ticket here, as we are not able to respond to PMs.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 11,092
# 43
01-19-2013, 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalecto View Post
Love this alternate design, definitely agree, it would make a great 25th century dreadnought! Add an additional 3rd nacelle on the centre aft, dorsal engineering section, a Phaser Spinal Lance to the centre forward, ventral saucer section and a standard cloaking device with a science focused BOff station set up. Resulting in all good things... Right?
Not sure if bad troll, or really really good one.
http://i1151.photobucket.com/albums/o633/centersolace/189cux9khvl6ojpg_zpsca7ccff0.jpg

So inhumane superweapons, mass murder, and canon nonsense is okay, but speedos are too much for some people.
Commander
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 265
# 44
01-19-2013, 04:24 PM
I could definitely see this as a Starfleet cruiser, especially if cleaned up a bit. Not an Oddy variant, but a whole 'nother ship. (Would make for an interesting Frankenship, though )
Ensign
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 21
# 45
01-19-2013, 04:31 PM
If cruisers were actually fun to play, I might have played it. I have an odyssey, among other items I've bought, because I didn't just want to play the game without paying.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 78
# 46
01-19-2013, 04:56 PM
Interesting, though I'd need to see it in 3D to truly get a feel for all the dimensions. The hardest part of making a good looking space ship is getting it looking right from every angle. So many fan designs look interesting from the base 2D prospective, but they just fall apart when you see them as a whole in 3D.

Still, the concept on this one it interesting enough. It's hardly as bad as many people are stating, though it's different enough that many won't see the appeal. Witch is perfectly fine.
Rihannsu
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 948
# 47
01-19-2013, 05:33 PM
I support this coming to STO.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 186
# 48
01-19-2013, 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thay8472 View Post
hmmmm i can't see the attraction.
I hate to say it, but its down right fugly to me. Just no.
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,652
# 49
01-19-2013, 06:02 PM
Well, I'd definitely want the saucer section, neck design, and engineering hull + deflector parts as options for the Odyssey

The rest? Definitely the most unique take I've seen on a Starfleet ship, I'll admit that, but it just doesn't fit really. So I'll have to say no to the nacelle/pylon design thing going on there
Was named Trek17, but still an author.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 175
# 50
01-19-2013, 11:26 PM
The Saucer and front hull look interesting, but the back...

Ugly as Sin. No thanks at all...

Thank you for the time...
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 AM.