> > > Hi Captains! The team continues to investigate an issue where some players may be stuck on a loading screen. We appreciate your continued patience! < < <
Jolan tru Captain!
Welcome to Legacy of Romulus!
If you have purchased a Legacy or Starter Pack, please see this thread for instructions on how to claim your items in-game. (Please see the yellow text in the linked thread for instructions on creating a Reman.) (Not seeing your pack in-game? Please see the lime-green text in the linked thread above for information.)
If you have additional questions about the Legacy or Starter pack, please read this FAQ.
Thanks SO MUCH for all your support, and we'll see you in-game!
- The Star Trek Online Team
***Resolved Issues***
"Login failed for unknown reason" error
Missing additional character slot for current/ lapsed Gold Members
Slow patching in the launcher
A bug that involved Romulan Liberated Borg captains and their skills once they chose an ally
Enterprise NX 01, A, B or E.....where we can view the outside like how the C was and maybe even go inside.
Only surviving one is the A we know was decommissioned, the others were either destroyed or since their fate was left unknown they cannot be used as their fate was left unknown (B and E).
Actually, it's pretty much what Age said. The only reason we can't have a T5 TOS Constitution is because there's a clause in the contract stating this. None whatsoever of a T5 NX for all I know.
Actually, it's pretty much what Age said. The only reason we can't have a T5 TOS Constitution is because there's a clause in the contract stating this. None whatsoever of a T5 NX for all I know.
The frames for all of the T1 ships are just that, frames. They can stick all sorts of fire power into a similarly sized Defiant class, I think they can get away with doing the same in a T5 NX.
The frames for all of the T1 ships are just that, frames. They can stick all sorts of fire power into a similarly sized Defiant class, I think they can get away with doing the same in a T5 NX.
Yep, I like the idea. It's already stated in game it's a replica... so why couldn't it be a replica on par with other 24-25th century ships? The design has proven itself, the Akira is an inverted NX after all! (Chronology wise, that is)
Yep, I like the idea. It's already stated in game it's a replica... so why couldn't it be a replica on par with other 24-25th century ships? The design has proven itself, the Akira is an inverted NX after all! (Chronology wise, that is)
Because the frame is the same.
Funny how people are using the Defiant as a excuse ... the Defiant prototype was shelved because it almost broke itself apart testing the engines and was only later that was corrected.
Now you want to put that Warp Core in a Constitution ... its not going to end well.
They are not on part because the frame is not on par, its like saying "why cant a Ford T have the same performance as a Bugatti Veyron", some ships have better frames that is why the B'rel managed to stay in service for so long or the Excelsior, they have really good frames.
The NX and the Constitution dont.
And dont go on about technobabble, its always bad when Trek have to come up with Space Magic to hide bad writting and its certainly not more acceptable because you want to have your toy car having the same performance of another toy car, they even given us that with Fleet Ships that is pretty much turning a Volkswagen Beetle into a Bugatti Veyron but there are limits, the Tier 0 should NOT be upgraded.
Cryptic isn't going to use the JJ Models since they are exclusive to another timeline.
And the Enterprise-A wasn't a new ship, it was the USS Yorktown that was in the final stages of refit.
Cryptic isn't going to use the JJ models because they're exclusive to another company; CBS doesn't own even a tiny bit of them. Paramount and CBS went their separate ways years ago, and the 2009 movie is the first thing produced by Paramount without CBS owning a piece.
If CBS could let them put it in, they would, because it would increase their ability to leverage the press hype surrounding the new movies. That's why we don't get the ships from that movie that DO come from the STO timeline: Spock's future ship, the Narada, and the Kelvin. It'd take a special deal with Paramount to get any of those ships.
I don't know if there are details in the CBS contract that would prohibit making that deal with Paramount, but I'm sure it'd be an expensive deal if they were allowed to make it.
Volunteer Community Moderator for the Star Trek Online Forums. My views do not represent those of Cryptic Studios or Perfect World Entertainment. If you wish to speak to someone on the community team, file a 'forums and website' support ticket here, as we are not able to respond to PMs regarding moderation inquiries. Follow me: Twitter,Google
And the Enterprise-A wasn't a new ship, it was the USS Yorktown that was in the final stages of refit.
The U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 from the Original Series was refit during the interlude between Star Trek: The Original Series and Star Trek: The Motion Picture. The version that we saw in the Motion Picture was in fact the same ship from the Original Series just with certain new features (such as new pylons, interior, engine, and nacelles among other things).
However at the end of Star Trek: The Search for Spock, the original U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701 was completely and irreversibly, destroyed. Between the successful self-destruct sequence and subsequently burning up in the Genesis Planets Atmosphere, there was absolutely no chance at recovery of that star-ship.
At the end of Star Trek: The Voyage Home, the U.S.S. Yorktown (itself having undergone most of the same refits as the original Enterprise) was deigned to be renamed the Enterprise-A. What I meant by "Entirely new ship" was not that the ship itself was brand spanking new (if we were going by that logic they would have been given the Excelsior Class as the Enterprise-A instead of the former Yorktown, but they were given a Constition Class instead). What I meant was that the ship was new to the Enterprise Crew themselves and that it wasn't in fact the original enterprise. Hence it was a "NEW" Enterprise, even if it wasn't literally brand new.