> > > Hi Captains! The team is investigating an issue where some players may be stuck on a loading screen. Thanks for your patience! < < <
We are aware there is a queue to log in at this time. We are working to get you in-game as soon as possible.
UPDATE!We're aware of a Skill Points issue that some Romulan Liberated Borg captains may be experiencing, as well as players not being able to delete mail, and are working towards a resolution.
Jolan tru Captain!
Welcome to Legacy of Romulus!
If you have purchased a Legacy or Starter Pack, please see this thread for instructions on how to claim your items in-game. (Please see the yellow text in the linked thread for instructions on creating a Reman.) (Not seeing your pack in-game? Please see the lime-green text in the linked thread above for information.)
If you have additional questions about the Legacy or Starter pack, please read this FAQ.
Thanks SO MUCH for all your support, and we'll see you in-game!
- The Star Trek Online Team
"Login failed for unknown reason" error
Missing additional character slot for current/ lapsed Gold Members
Well ive notice that the Bridge officer layout on the andorian ship depends on the class... one thing that i dont like, mainly because on other ships that are sold in 3 pack ships they have the same bridge officer layout (odyssey pack and vesta pack) and only change the console layout...
so i think that the only bridge officer layout that the andorian ship should have is the engineering one
1 commander tac
1 lt commander tac
1 lt engi
1 ensign universal
1 lt universal
and maintain the console slots layout that they have for the 3 ships
This is because a lt tac bridge officer with a commander and a lt commander is just useless
if you do this PWE and cryptic you would be doing a great job =) and i would buy the pack
I'd have also like to seen a Mk XII version of the Andorian Phasers with it. The Vesta comes with a Mk XII cannon, it should have at least been an option for this ship. And yes, the lt tactical is a little weird, but it could have uses. Personally, I'd use the Charal for its boff layout.
I have always thought the B'Rel Retrofit should of had 5 fore and 2 aft for weapons instead of just 4 fore and 2 aft. This specific weapon layout should have been exclusive to the KDF side instead of being on Fed ships.
I usually disagree when new fed ships come out and KDF-focused players complain about the new ship, and how is renders something they have stupid or worthless or no longer "unique" to the faction. But this time I have to agree. Klingons should be the ones focused on the forward-firing ouch. Hell, their T3 battlecruiser has the same layout as their T5 bird of prey. That's how much they love focusing their fire forward. I'm not sure why this Andorian ship needed to have a fifth forward slot. It doesn't seem to take much, if any penalty in trade-offs. If I had to choose between this thing and a T5 escort, it would be absolutely no contest.
I'm not sure why this Andorian ship needed to have a fifth forward slot. It doesn't seem to take much, if any penalty in trade-offs. If I had to choose between this thing and a T5 escort, it would be absolutely no contest.
Why go through the effort of making things unique, different and balanced, when its easier to make something sell when its just outright better?