Lieutenant
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
# 1 Andorian Escort: Kumari Line
02-16-2013, 02:58 AM
Everyone else see that screenshot on sto mainpage? Thats a slick looking ship. Who else is gonna nab that sucker when it touches Z-Store?
Lieutenant
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 92
# 2
02-16-2013, 03:05 AM
Looks spiffy, but really don't know until they release stats. I mean, appearance is of course immensely important. But you don't know if it's flyable till you see the boff/console layout. There's still the chance it'll be gimped and useless.
Lieutenant
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 48
# 3
02-16-2013, 03:27 AM
Well with the layouts they've been using on the ships lately, they haven't really put out a bad one. Well that I noticed. Chell Grett and Jemmy dread are both very good ones. At least, from a PVE'r perspective.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 147
# 4
02-16-2013, 04:30 AM
I'm expecting a 5-fore weapon loadout for it and it looks like it'd complement well with my Andorian main, but if it's a 3-pack I'm definitely not getting it. Not until it's available at a sale at least.
Captain
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 634
# 5
02-16-2013, 04:45 AM
I think it will have excellent forward guns, high top speed yet poor turn rate (for an escort) It will be bigger than most escorts bit like the armitage. Bit like a light destroyer than an escort. Thats my theory anyhoo.
A member of Romulan Intelligence. A fleet with over 400 members growing daily, friendly, relaxed, fun. We are the only fleet with the pure name of Romulan Intelligence. Welcome to the Tal Shiar. Look us up in game.

My You Tube new ESD tour Vid part 1: http://youtu.be/2CFCMkr830Y
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,001
# 6
02-16-2013, 05:01 AM
The concept of 5 forward weapon hardpoints worries me mightily.

On a buffed tac, that would add another 2-3k dps right there, if running a 5th dhc. Or it can invalidate discussions about the benefits of replacing the 4th dhc with a torpedo: just do both. Really, I'd rather see it having a 6th tac console than a 5th forward weapon slot, in terms of game balance.

I hope I'm overestimating the effects of such a thing, or that it doesn't come to pass. Or if it has to be, balance it by giving it no aft weapon slots, or something, so that dps output stays roughly the same.
Captain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 843
# 7
02-16-2013, 05:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by twam View Post
The concept of 5 forward weapon hardpoints worries me mightily.

On a buffed tac, that would add another 2-3k dps right there, if running a 5th dhc. Or it can invalidate discussions about the benefits of replacing the 4th dhc with a torpedo: just do both. Really, I'd rather see it having a 6th tac console than a 5th forward weapon slot, in terms of game balance.

I hope I'm overestimating the effects of such a thing, or that it doesn't come to pass. Or if it has to be, balance it by giving it no aft weapon slots, or something, so that dps output stays roughly the same.
Ask cryptic has confirmed that 5 fore weapons are next in the line so doesn't matter what we think

I'd rather have 10 fore weapons than more I hold you in place for 200 seconds cheese consoles for gods sake
----=====This is my opinion you don't have to listen and no one else has to read them these "OPINIONS" are based on my exploits and my learning other people will have their opinions and that's fine just don't knock my way of doing things thanks=====----
Lieutenant
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 92
# 8
02-16-2013, 05:39 AM
Well if it turns out it's ridiculously over-powered then I'm definitely getting one. All hail our new andorian overlords, and three cheers for blue girls in miniskirts.
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 418
# 9
02-16-2013, 05:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustiswordz View Post
I think it will have excellent forward guns, high top speed yet poor turn rate (for an escort) It will be bigger than most escorts bit like the armitage. Bit like a light destroyer than an escort. Thats my theory anyhoo.
Those two aspects would be directly at odds with each other. No point in having almost all of your firepower forward if you can't bring it to bear.
Captain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 843
# 10
02-16-2013, 05:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by variant37 View Post
Those two aspects would be directly at odds with each other. No point in having almost all of your firepower forward if you can't bring it to bear.
You mean like the bortasqu and the Jem dread
----=====This is my opinion you don't have to listen and no one else has to read them these "OPINIONS" are based on my exploits and my learning other people will have their opinions and that's fine just don't knock my way of doing things thanks=====----
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:22 AM.