Star Trek Online Stardate???
 Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Thread Tools Display Modes
Career Officer
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,163
# 21
04-29-2013, 09:50 PM
Quote:
 Originally Posted by technimyoko 1) I've been a user for over a year (despite what it claims my join date is... I got the game before it went free), it says "After a certain amount of time has passed since your registration date, you will be able to create new threads", how long do they want? 2) Has anyone come up with a formula for stardates accurate to the game? I've used about 5 different sites and they call have different ones. And others don't reveal their math. I need the math.
1) No idea, very sorry.

2) Following the general formula established by TNG et. al., 2409 is Stardates 86000.0 - 86999.9. As for specific conversion of calendar date/time to stardate, I use the following formula: Current Star Year + 1000*((Days elapsed in year + (hours elapsed in day/24) + (minutes elapsed in hour/1440))/365)

So for April 29th, 2409, 9:40PM that becomes 86000 + 1000*((31+28+31+29+(21/24)+(40/1440))/365) = 86000 + 1000 * (119.903 / 365) = Stardate 86328.5

"Freedom is just a pretty idea unless it's backed by Force."

An Introduction to the Gorn (RP guide) / Ten Forward Fanfics
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,817
# 22
04-30-2013, 07:40 AM
Quote:
 Originally Posted by sander233 1) No idea, very sorry. 2) Following the general formula established by TNG et. al., 2409 is Stardates 86000.0 - 86999.9. As for specific conversion of calendar date/time to stardate, I use the following formula: Current Star Year + 1000*((Days elapsed in year + (hours elapsed in day/24) + (minutes elapsed in hour/1440))/365) So for April 29th, 2409, 9:40PM that becomes 86000 + 1000*((31+28+31+29+(21/24)+(40/1440))/365) = 86000 + 1000 * (119.903 / 365) = Stardate 86328.5
Well, what RL date is 90916.78?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, lovely, I can't even requote the Douglas Adams quote I used to have here I WANT IT BACK!!!!
Dalo Lorn
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,320
# 23
04-30-2013, 11:14 AM
Quote:
 Originally Posted by dalolorn Well, what RL date is 90916.78?
December 1st, 2413

@greendragoon
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,817
# 24
04-30-2013, 11:17 AM
Quote:
 Originally Posted by thegreendragoon1 December 1st, 2413
So we're in the middle of December... good to know.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, lovely, I can't even requote the Douglas Adams quote I used to have here I WANT IT BACK!!!!
Dalo Lorn
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,320
# 25
04-30-2013, 11:20 AM
Your character might be. Stardates in STO are based on how long the character has been around. It's different for everyone.

@greendragoon
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,817
# 26
04-30-2013, 11:31 AM
Quote:
 Originally Posted by thegreendragoon1 Your character might be. Stardates in STO are based on how long the character has been around. It's different for everyone.
Ummmm... my logs say otherwise.

Edit: Yep, they do.

VA characters created around early February and somewhere in May/June, both being created last year.

Made test log entries for both of them, about 10 seconds of relog between them, and they both say 90933.62.

Re-edit: And if that's not proof enough, then how do you explain fleet news having perfectly normal stardates?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, lovely, I can't even requote the Douglas Adams quote I used to have here I WANT IT BACK!!!!
Dalo Lorn

Last edited by dalolorn; 04-30-2013 at 11:34 AM.
Career Officer
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,163
# 27
04-30-2013, 11:40 AM
Quote:
 Originally Posted by dalolorn Ummmm... my logs say otherwise. Edit: Yep, they do. VA characters created around early February and somewhere in May/June, both being created last year. Made test log entries for both of them, about 10 seconds of relog between them, and they both say 90933.62. Re-edit: And if that's not proof enough, then how do you explain fleet news having perfectly normal stardates?
Because Cryptic, much like the TOS writers, is apparently pulling stardates out of a hat.

"Freedom is just a pretty idea unless it's backed by Force."

An Introduction to the Gorn (RP guide) / Ten Forward Fanfics
Captain
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,746
# 28
05-01-2013, 05:00 PM
Quote:
 Originally Posted by sander233 Because Cryptic, much like the TOS writers, is apparently pulling stardates out of a hat.
Well inconsistency IS canon .
Play more STO Foundry! (You can thank me later.)

A TIME TO SEARCH: ENTER MY FOUNDRY MISSION at the RISA SYSTEM in the SIRIUS SECTOR
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 888
# 29
05-02-2013, 08:51 PM
Quote:
 Originally Posted by sander233 Because Cryptic, much like the TOS writers, is apparently pulling stardates out of a hat.
Actually first-season TNG had the goofiest stardates of all. True, they all began with 41xxx, but there was no rhyme or reason to the order of the last three digits. The kicker? If you were to rearrange all the first-season TNG episodes in order of their stardates, Tasha Yar appears in several episodes after "Skin of Evil" (the one in which she dies).

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is Off HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:56 AM.