Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,241
# 231
04-07-2013, 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by archoncryptic View Post
We are planning to have Romulan Fleet ships. Details TBA.
What I find very disappointing is the design function of these ships.

There is no trinity. No cruisers, no science. Just escort types (battlecruisers are really heavy escorts lets not kid ourselves here).


I was hoping the trinity would be returned not per faction but instead be created by the factions.

Federation being the science and cruiser faction.
Klingons being the raider and dreadnaught/carrier faction
Romulans being the battlecruiser and escort faction.

But... no. Instead we get all factions being twisted into the DPS-focused lame-lazy cookie-cutter mold.
http://media.tumblr.com/160cacdb395f8340dac90864182ebe16/tumblr_inline_mx9yxhItkb1qg9pkt.jpg
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,925
# 232
04-07-2013, 11:15 AM
Actually I think the Scimitar will be the Bortas-Odyssey of the Romulans.
Let us wear Swimsuits on Foundry maps or bridges please! I would pay zen for that.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,641
# 233
04-07-2013, 11:33 AM
Judging by how few Romulan designs there may be, if they can get away with using the Scimitar, then they will, regardless of whether it works or not. It's about the same size as the Jem Hadar Battlecruiser isn't it (the one that blew the Valiant away)? We've got that as playable, the Scimitar need not be no different. x5 fore weapons, x3 aft.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,925
# 234
04-07-2013, 11:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by flash525 View Post
Judging by how few Romulan designs there may be, if they can get away with using the Scimitar, then they will, regardless of whether it works or not. It's about the same size as the Jem Hadar Battlecruiser isn't it (the one that blew the Valiant away)? We've got that as playable, the Scimitar need not be no different. x5 fore weapons, x3 aft.
5 fore, 3 aft? Cryptic.... make that and take my money.
Let us wear Swimsuits on Foundry maps or bridges please! I would pay zen for that.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 744
# 235
04-07-2013, 11:41 AM
If the Scimitar becomes playable, the Jupiter and / or Typhoon should be for Feds, and some sort of equivalent for KDF.
Join Date: July 29 2008
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,925
# 236
04-07-2013, 11:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by felderburg View Post
If the Scimitar becomes playable, the Jupiter and / or Typhoon should be for Feds, and some sort of equivalent for KDF.

They do have the Bortasque and the Odyssey as equivalents.
Let us wear Swimsuits on Foundry maps or bridges please! I would pay zen for that.
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,268
# 237
04-07-2013, 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by felderburg View Post
If the Scimitar becomes playable, the Jupiter and / or Typhoon should be for Feds, and some sort of equivalent for KDF.
Not sure why. The Scimitar was a class of warbird. These are the most notable/ authoritative references I could find, neither of which mention it as some kind of dreadnaught Memory-Alpha, Star Trek.com

Though I am prepared to admit - Armed with 52 disruptor banks, 27 photon torpedo bays might be aimed a wee bit high for STO

What I do find really interesting though is how the Remans, essentially a "slave-race" of the Romulan Empire were able to design and develop such a predatory warship without the Romulans knowing about it???

Last edited by drkfrontiers; 04-07-2013 at 11:53 AM.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,341
# 238
04-07-2013, 11:59 AM
I could very well see the Scimitar as a carrier, it's big enough. And then it wouldn?t be so crippled by it's probably horrible turn rate....
Only Internet users deal in absolutes !
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,679
# 239
04-07-2013, 12:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by drkfrontiers View Post
Though I am prepared to admit - Armed with 52 disruptor banks, 27 photon torpedo bays might be aimed a wee bit high for STO
Keep in mind that weapons, like everything else, are abstracted here. All those numbers, to me, just say "4 front weapons, 4 back weapons, balanced for beams".
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,075
# 240
04-07-2013, 12:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by drkfrontiers View Post
Though I am prepared to admit - Armed with 52 disruptor banks, 27 photon torpedo bays might be aimed a wee bit high for STO
It should come with a Last Starfighter Death Blossom-type console.
---------------------------------------------------
U.S.S. Endeavour NCC-91771 - Nebula-class
Commanding Officer: Captain Pyotr Ramonovich Amosov
Dedication Plaque: "Leave nothing unattempted" - James Cook
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:47 PM.