Ensign
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 19
# 41
04-19-2013, 12:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by captiandata1 View Post
the galaxy lance would a lot more cool if it was able to fire more often thne once every 3 minutes. and yes the doff layout needs to be change to something more useful on bothe the gals family and the D'Deridex ships
And it'd be cool if the lance fired from that lance-looking bit under the saucer that shoots torpedoes, instead of the current phaser strip thrown over where 10-forward would be.
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,394
# 42
04-19-2013, 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximumname View Post
instead of the current phaser strip thrown over where 10-forward would be.
It's unlikely Ten Forward is still there in the alternate timeline that spawned this three nacelled dreadnought. As commanding officer and admiral, Riker would have long since replaced it with the Happy Bottom Riding Club.
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,468
# 43
04-19-2013, 01:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoggymack22 View Post
It's unlikely Ten Forward is still there in the alternate timeline that spawned this three nacelled dreadnought. As commanding officer and admiral, Riker would have long since replaced it with the Happy Bottom Riding Club.
Of course ten forward is still there. There was a scene in the Galaxy-X in All Good Things in ten forward.

It's just a visual glitch it's firing from the edge of the saucer than the lance hard point underneath the edge... Or that the beam is so wide it creeps up the saucer from the hard point to the edge.

Riker would probably convert ten forward to a blues lounge if he wasn't busy running a starbase and a few sectors of space
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,394
# 44
04-19-2013, 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by edalgo View Post
Of course ten forward is still there.
Nah. Not in 2409. Admiral Riker's Happy Bottom Riding Club has long since replaced it. So he could get more firepower out of his phaser lance.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 881
# 45
04-19-2013, 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoggymack22 View Post
That's the biggest problem with the change. Ensign engineering slots are now at the point where 1 can be left blank. That's bad design by the folks at Cryptic.



I just think with cruisers where they are at, pushing for a fleet Galaxy X, and then having to spend money or dil/zen to get the modules to purchase this ship, is something that should probably be avoided. As a community it might be more beneficial to push for something to be done about cruisers and their many problems and THEN get the devs to roll out a nifty new fleet version of a cruiser.

Or you know, May is coming and the C-Store's going to be filled with Romulan ships to buy so again, pushing for something that will most likely have poor sales might only make things worse? I don't know.

well, we are not pushing for a fleet galaxy x, he is already on the way as well as the fleet gurumba for example, this as been confirm by gecko himself.
what we are pushing for however is a change of bo layout and others things concerning this ship.

as a comunity it would be certainly more beneficial for the game to do what you suggest but i bielieve this theory will be hurt by 2 things:

first a push of the community implying that the cruiser are not WAD are in direct conflict with gecko view, and ego. i bieliev he is rather rigid on this subject.

second, i unfortunatly don't share your optimism concerning the power of "our" community, due to the fact that everybody got his own opinion about it and that it is different from eatch other.

that the 2 big points, but you also have to realize that even if gecko finally accept to change some things on cruiser that will not solve some specific problem concerning the galaxy x, and it that regard, it might be selfish but not useless to bring attention to it.

beside i bielieve that there is more chance to demonstrate that the galaxy x is in contradiction with is design role, than to demonstrate that all cruiser or moreso that the engi power need a rethinking from the devs.

a redesign of the galaxy x, will allows us galaxy x pilot to be on part with the now useless cruiser line, not less
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,394
# 46
04-19-2013, 02:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by neo1nx View Post
this as been confirm by gecko himself.
As a proud owner of a Kumari Andorian Escort Three Pack, I totally understand that this ship is on the way. I just, you know, want folks to remember how long that Andorian ship was ... "on the way."

Quote:
what we are pushing for however is a change of bo layout and others things concerning this ship.
Unless it's something like this:

Tier:5
Hull:34,500
Standard Shields:5,225 (Mk X)
Shield Modifier:1
Weapons: 4 fore 3 aft
Can equip dual cannons.
Crew:50
Bridge Officers: Commander Tactical, Lt. Commander Tactical, Ensign Engineering, Lt. Universal, Lt. Universal
Device Slots:2
Consoles: 5 Tactical 4 Engineering 1 Science
Turn Rate:20
Impulse Modifier:0.22
Inertia rating:70
Bonus Power:+15 weapons power

I doubt it's going to be worth the fleet module.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 881
# 47
04-19-2013, 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoggymack22 View Post
As a proud owner of a Kumari Andorian Escort Three Pack, I totally understand that this ship is on the way. I just, you know, want folks to remember how long that Andorian ship was ... "on the way."



Unless it's something like this:

Tier:5
Hull:34,500
Standard Shields:5,225 (Mk X)
Shield Modifier:1
Weapons: 4 fore 3 aft
Can equip dual cannons.
Crew:50
Bridge Officers: Commander Tactical, Lt. Commander Tactical, Ensign Engineering, Lt. Universal, Lt. Universal
Device Slots:2
Consoles: 5 Tactical 4 Engineering 1 Science
Turn Rate:20
Impulse Modifier:0.22
Inertia rating:70
Bonus Power:+15 weapons power

I doubt it's going to be worth the fleet module.
an escort, hehe, funny.

the years of escort online
everygood things must come to an end tho.
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,394
# 48
04-19-2013, 03:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by neo1nx View Post
an escort, hehe, funny.

the years of escort online
everygood things must come to an end tho.
That's not just an escort. That's the JHAS.

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:53 PM.