Republic Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 124
# 1 Beam Fire at Will I-III
04-30-2013, 04:29 PM
Based on the tooltip, the difference in terms of DPS is only 100 when comparing BFaW I and III. Is this number significant? Would it be better to run omega I and bfaw I or bfaw III and beta I?
Republic Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 124
# 2
05-06-2013, 09:08 PM
Very helpful guys, thanks.
Empire Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 873
# 3
05-06-2013, 09:17 PM
I like bfaw III because its pretty
I drink, I vote, and I PvP!
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,192
# 4
05-06-2013, 09:55 PM
The DPS per hit is not much greater, but if I'm not mistaken FAW shoots 5 hits instead 4 per volley.
Survivor of Romulus
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,690
# 5
05-07-2013, 12:40 AM
AFAIK the main difference between BFAW1-3 is the number of targets that are able to be hit...not sure about damage as i really dont like using FAW

Originally Posted by borticuscryptic View Post
I find this line of replies sadly hilarious. We put a lot of work into the massive list of fixes/changes above, and ya'll are hung up on the ability to skip our content. =p
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 270
# 6
05-07-2013, 04:22 AM
I would not really ever use high tier FAW for anything Omega is much better there, lower tier FAW in PvP is perhaps good for knocking out pets (shield repair drones kill (I mean heal about as much as transfer shield strength)). And in borg PvE you end up doing less damage since you hit borg that regen far to much. Faw is really only a pet destroyer, it still is nice in 1v1, but 1v1 cruisers are kinda a pain both for the enemy and themselves (although there was one aux2batt build that I went up against once that was really nice).

Starfleet M.A.C.O. KDF Honour Guard

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 AM.