Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 186
# 21
05-20-2013, 05:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by defalus View Post
There's a new design based on the Connie (Exeter) in the game already, but CBS is blocking it from being available at higher rank as a refit.
that's cause CBS suck and are so strict with what shud be in a STAR TREK game, and obviously decent ships arnt allowed, thanks CBS
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 186
# 22
05-20-2013, 05:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jam3s1701 View Post
Again really. . .

ANOTHER constitution request thread this is just a simple LOL moment
I agree with your signature pal XD, that's what we get for letting a star wars fan direct a trek film XD
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 136
# 23
05-20-2013, 07:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmurphy View Post
As far as i know, no Klingon ship can go to transwarp, (outside sto.) The Klingon don't use the same ships from two hundred years ago but designs ships based on proven concepts and designs. increasing reactors, disturbers and so on. that's why we always see similar ship from them, while starfleet excels at making new ship designs, learning from past flaws, improving them and retiring them if need be.
Hi bro i dont fully agree, is true kdf upgrade thier ship but keep the desing line , BUT yuo can see the old D7 flying in the game(mi KDF have this one) and the almost same age old Brel (a few decades diference i dont remenber really) and dont forget the romulan side bird of prey, their have a fleet variant also.(this as in game reallity not a lore fact)

Some thing i dont think ever happen in this game is to be a fully 100% Star Trek lore, escort and shoot kill rule this game no exploration no real diplomacy, so thats "to me" let a hole where i can say : ey why not a T5 constitution...


Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmurphy View Post
Look at it this way if you were running a country and you needed to protect the population would you leave it to a 200 year old man o'war or to a newer air craft carrier that could do things 300 times faster and better?
If in my fleet have a old ship remove old wepons and engines put some new gear and put that in patrol of mi inner borders or for support of a brand new ship the upgrade is more cheap and fast than build a new one from start


on a side note i still fly mi T1 constitution in mi lvl 50 tactical in most of episodes ... yes im that crazy


again sry for mi english and i dont want offend anyone here , this is mi personal opinion
Armada Estelar Argentina
I support : Bridge modules;What is your beef with the Galaxy Cryptic? the longest post until now, maybe it's time to do something about it ... SRS-Galaxy COMM Channel for all captains of Galaxy-R/-X to be united in the Galaxy Class attack Wing, a multi fleet escuadron

Last edited by ehgato; 05-20-2013 at 07:24 AM. Reason: add info
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 154
# 24
05-20-2013, 07:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehgato View Post
If in my fleet have a old ship remove old wepons and engines put some new gear and put that in patrol of mi inner borders or for support of a brand new ship the upgrade is more cheap and fast than build a new one from start
the point i was making is that it's not really feasible if you have to tare the ship apart all the way to it's keel to upgrade those engines and weapons. by time you done you have already spent the man hours to build two new ships. one to tear it apart and one to rebuild.

that's basically why the Big E was decomposition this last year, to get her up to scratch with the rest of the fleet the us government would have had to basically rebuild her.

the real truth behind why the Klingon use the same ships is because the Klingon have never really gotten much love by the creators of startrek, it's easier to just use the same enemy ships then to build new ones ever week. witch they did until half way through ds9 and the start of voyager.

people just like the sound of Klingon upgrading there ships, when in reality most active service ships have to go in for a refit once ever 3 year, the max being 5 years. the war and tare on the hall just cant take longer.
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,394
# 25
05-20-2013, 08:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ccmurphy View Post
On another note CBS has it right stopping criptic from making a tear 5 Conny. by the time of this game the ship is over 200 years old. in the time of Next gen, most Conny's were scraped, only a handful were used for Museum ships.
CBS has the D'Kyr at Tier 5.

And in a day or so, the T'Varo will be available at T5.

Both of those ships are far older than the Constitution class vessel.

Quote:
though everyone would argue that they saw some in survive on DS9. Those Conny's were the Museum Ships rushed into active survive because of heavy ship loss.
Not a single Constitution showed up in Deep Space 9.
Captain
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 533
# 26
05-20-2013, 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ehgato View Post
1st _ Sry for mi english.

2nd _ I really want a T5 Constitution the TOS not the one from JJ i dont like see fire on mi warp nacelles this is not star wars where a gas propeled turbine jump to ligth speed ... sry back to topic... if so many ppl flying under the starfleet flag but in a ship form tolian , jemhadar, ferengi, cardacian, mirror universe, or the future line of wells ship... what is the problem if a small group of ppl fly a T5 Constitution????? let them (and me) be happy

To much old for keep up ??? with that argument remove the mirandas , and excelciors for the game.

If the federation always was know for be capable of remarcable tech and upgrades, why the klingons have competent Brel and D7 and starfleet cant made the same upgrades and refit for they ship ?????

this is mi opinion , and hope madeit in rasonable terms sry again for any miss speling
this is from the Original Series writer's guide:

The Enterprise has a secondary propulsion
system. These are impulse power engines
(same principle as rocket power), located
at the rear of the "saucer section".

Impulse power is just another name for rocket power.

http://captainrobertapril.angelfire....ters_Guide.pdf
Ensign
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 8
# 27
05-20-2013, 10:19 AM
OK maybe a silly statement, but why would you have to tear it apart? (Hers the silly part) Couldn't you use a teleporter of some sort to take out the old engines and such and beam the new ones back in? Even if it was in sections I do not think it would take the time it would take to build a new ship, let alone two.

Now maybe I am wrong, with what can and cant be teleported. But a body is a crazy machine made up of living parts and that can be beamed about.

I understand people have attachment to ship classes, I love the Miranda and the Excelsior but I am from a older generation of Trek. I was never a fan of the Galaxy Class.

It seems people just want to fly around space the way Kirk did, and I am not judging that. Would people be happy with a T5 ship that shared traits of the Connie design pattern?

I might be missing some thing, and if so no reason to flame. Just thought I would add some thing to this and maybe learn some thing in return
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 136
# 28
05-20-2013, 10:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by khan5000 View Post
this is from the Original Series writer's guide:

The Enterprise has a secondary propulsion
system. These are impulse power engines
(same principle as rocket power), located
at the rear of the "saucer section".

Impulse power is just another name for rocket power.

http://captainrobertapril.angelfire....ters_Guide.pdf
ithink u quote me for this : ..... not the one from JJ i dont like see fire on mi warp nacelles this is not star wars where a gas propeled turbine jump to ligth speed .....


key words in your sentence "same principle" and "impulse power" not warp speed like in jj movies .

And no impulse is not a another name for rocket power , the fact the same principle dont mean is the same thing both system push the ship (this is the principle) but they use realy diferent methods i wish have at hand the tecnical manual where i read that but i dont have it anymore.

but the point here is the T5 constitution
Armada Estelar Argentina
I support : Bridge modules;What is your beef with the Galaxy Cryptic? the longest post until now, maybe it's time to do something about it ... SRS-Galaxy COMM Channel for all captains of Galaxy-R/-X to be united in the Galaxy Class attack Wing, a multi fleet escuadron

Last edited by ehgato; 05-20-2013 at 11:24 AM.
Captain
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 5,394
# 29
05-20-2013, 11:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by targoust View Post
I might be missing some thing, and if so no reason to flame. Just thought I would add some thing to this and maybe learn some thing in return
What you have here is a bunch of STO fans who love flying their Excelsior as the tip top cream of the crop cruiser complaining at Constitution fans because there's no way in heck a ship THAT old could compete with a Galaxy let alone a Sovereign or an Odyssey. Even though the Excelsior tops them all.

That clear it up for you?
Career Officer
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,006
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 PM.