Captain
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,181
# 1 Ferasan Escort Carrier
09-19-2013, 08:00 AM
Ferasan Escort Carrier
Commander Tactical
Lt. Commander Tactical
Lieutenant Engineering
Lieutenant Science
Ensign Engineer

4 Forward Weapons
3 Aft Weapons
Can Equip Dual Cannons
2 Device Slots
32000 Hull
0.9 Shield Modifier
15 Turn
0.20 Impulse Modifier
+15 Weapon Power Bonus
1 Hanger Bay that comes with Ferasan Fighters
4 Tactical Consoles
3 Engineering Consoles
2 Science Consoles

The Klingon side needs to have a faction specific Escort type Carrier as the Federation side has one and now the Romulan side is having one. By making such a carrier each side will have one making it fair. Another reason to add one is that Klingon players will buy the ship and it can also increase sales for the lower tier ships that come with unique hangers.
Republic Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,525
# 2
09-19-2013, 08:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by marshalericdavid View Post
Ferasan Escort Carrier
Commander Tactical
Lt. Commander Tactical
Lieutenant Engineering
Lieutenant Science
Ensign Engineer

4 Forward Weapons
3 Aft Weapons
Can Equip Dual Cannons
2 Device Slots
32000 Hull
0.9 Shield Modifier
15 Turn
0.20 Impulse Modifier
+15 Weapon Power Bonus
1 Hanger Bay that comes with Ferasan Fighters
4 Tactical Consoles
3 Engineering Consoles
2 Science Consoles

The Klingon side needs to have a faction specific Escort type Carrier as the Federation side has one and now the Romulan side is having one. By making such a carrier each side will have one making it fair. Another reason to add one is that Klingon players will buy the ship and it can also increase sales for the lower tier ships that come with unique hangers.
One would be nice but you're a bit to tactical...the Armitage has a Lt Cmdr Eng and the Ar'kif you're all but forced to put a Eng in that in the Lt Cmdr slot...
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 436
# 3
09-19-2013, 08:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by marshalericdavid View Post
Ferasan Escort Carrier
Commander Tactical
Lt. Commander Science
Lieutenant Engineering
Lieutenant Tactical
Ensign Engineer

4 Forward Weapons
3 Aft Weapons
Can Equip Dual Cannons
2 Device Slots
32000 Hull
0.9 Shield Modifier
15 Turn
0.20 Impulse Modifier
+15 Weapon Power Bonus
1 Hanger Bay that comes with Ferasan Fighters
4 Tactical Consoles
2 Engineering Consoles
3 Science Consoles

The Klingon side needs to have a faction specific Escort type Carrier as the Federation side has one and now the Romulan side is having one. By making such a carrier each side will have one making it fair. Another reason to add one is that Klingon players will buy the ship and it can also increase sales for the lower tier ships that come with unique hangers.
I think it would be better with this set up...
__________________________________________________

"The Road To Arc Is Paved With Good Intentions"
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 144
# 4
09-19-2013, 09:13 AM
May want to make that Lt. Cmdr. slot universal? It'd be able to accommodate everyone's taste then.
Republic Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 368
# 5
09-19-2013, 09:19 AM
Hrm, I always imagined that any hypothetical Ferasan ship would be analogous to the Andorian Escorts, to give the KDF something to match it in some way. A small and maneuverable ship with 5 forward weapon slots and 2 or 3 aft ones.
Plus, the KDF already have a ton of ships that have hangar bays, at various ranks (mostly the myriad of Orion Flight-Deck Cruisers and high level carriers). They don't necessarily need an Escort carrier.
Formerly GT-01. Runnin' a small lite-RP casual fleet called "The Voyagers"! Message me in-game at either Salen@GT01 or Xavok@GT01 if yer interested.
Here's my neat Idea's Thread.
Lieutenant
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 71
# 6
09-19-2013, 09:26 AM
Ferasan Escort Carrier
Commander Tactical
Lt. Commander Engineering
Lieutenant Science
Lieutenant Engineering
Ensign Universal

5 Forward Weapons
3 Aft Weapons
Can Equip Dual Cannons
3 Device Slots
37000 Hull
1 Shield Modifier
13 Turn
0.21 Impulse Modifier
+10 Wep Power Bonus
+5 Aux Power Bonus
+5 Engine Power Bonus
1 Hanger Bay that comes with Ferasan Fighters
5 Tactical Consoles
2 Engineering Consoles
2 Science Consoles

yes plz, would be on par with roms ships imo

i know know, something decent for kdf, don't take away that little bit hope i've plz
Captain
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,181
# 7
09-19-2013, 09:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sorceror01 View Post
Hrm, I always imagined that any hypothetical Ferasan ship would be analogous to the Andorian Escorts, to give the KDF something to match it in some way. A small and maneuverable ship with 5 forward weapon slots and 2 or 3 aft ones.
Plus, the KDF already have a ton of ships that have hangar bays, at various ranks (mostly the myriad of Orion Flight-Deck Cruisers and high level carriers). They don't necessarily need an Escort carrier.
Ferasan are a lot like Caitan who have fighters with their Carrier and Ferasan are more aggressive so having a escort carrier for them makes sense. Do the Klingon side need a escort carrier? I think they do to be able to compete in that area with Feds and Romulans. I think their should be a different 5 tac console ship maybe a K'Vort?
Rihannsu
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10,564
# 8
09-19-2013, 09:57 AM
I for one would love to see a Kilrathi, er.... Ferasan Carrier.
HAIL HYDRA!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I can haz joystick!
MMOs aren't charities. Corporations are supposed to make a profit. It's what they do.
Show Archon and Borticus how much you would like to see new Doff races!
Captain
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,700
# 9
09-19-2013, 10:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggyds View Post
Ferasan Escort Carrier *snip*
Might be too good, since that kind of layout and features is just outright superior, and it always creates problems when ships come out that are 'why would you use ANYTHING else?' Look at the nonsense of the Vesta or the Scimitar. Solving every 'gap' issue on a single ship would just be a mess.

Drop 0.1 shield, 5k hull, a 4/3 weapon layout, and the ensign goes tac or maybe eng, 3/2/4 console setup, then it looks like a more even matchup.
Lieutenant
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 71
# 10
09-19-2013, 10:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by reginamala78 View Post
Might be too good, since that kind of layout and features is just outright superior, and it always creates problems when ships come out that are 'why would you use ANYTHING else?' Look at the nonsense of the Vesta or the Scimitar. Solving every 'gap' issue on a single ship would just be a mess.

Drop 0.1 shield, 5k hull, a 4/3 weapon layout, and the ensign goes tac or maybe eng, 3/2/4 console setup, then it looks like a more even matchup.
Looks like a nerfed jhec
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:00 PM.