It uses the exact same text description as the Caitain which is tradable. no where in the description for the borg boff does it say that it is in a box and once opened is not tradable. You can't return the box and if you've already bought another boff, you'd assume that since it's the same description it would be the same.
Do you do that often? Assume stuff and then complain that reality doesn't meet your assuption? Actually the reverse is true: the Caitian BOFF shares the description with the Liberated Borg BOFF, which predates the Caitian one by over a year.
Nothing Crytic did here is false advertising.
The User made a mistake.
Perhaps didn't read enough or take a couple minutes to research his purchase.
Whatever the reason, decrying the company that provided exactly what you purchased, for providing it.
That's not the way to handle things.
It was a $5 mistake.
Be thankful that it wasn't something more costly.
Read and Reread everything about what you are about to buy.
Take 5 minutes and look up info on it, as there are multiple places that S T O information is available online.
Use this as a cautionary tale.
But accusing the company for being responsible for your mistake ?
That's really not a very nice way to handle things.
Today's regulations define three main acts that constitute false advertising: failure to disclose, flawed and insignificant research, and product disparagement. The majority of these regulations are outlined in the Lanham Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C.A. ? 1051 et seq), which contains the statutes that govern trademark law in the United States.
Failure to Disclose: It is considered false advertising under the Lanham Act if a representation is "untrue as a result of the failure to disclose a material fact." Therefore, false advertising can come from both misstatements and partially correct statements that are misleading because they do not disclose something the consumer should know. The Trademark Law Revision Act of 1988, which added several amendments to the Lanham Act, left creation of the line between sufficient and insufficient disclosure to the discretion of the courts.
Directly from the C-Store: If you discard, sell, trade, or use a Borg Bridge Officer for training, you WILL NOT be able to claim a free replacement from the C-Store. You can only have a single Borg Bridge Officer active at once.
Actually they are. When you are selling a product or a service it is your responsibility, as the seller, to make the details of the item/service explicitly clear. In this case, the cstore description is very poorly worded. To put it simply: the buyer assumed things worked a certain way because the wording in the description implied that it did. While i'm sure the intention is not false advertising, the fact is that it does technically fall under that definition - the description is not clear enough to give an accurate explanation as to how the whole trading thing works, in regards to the item. It also heavily implies that it works in a way that it does not - as in the other boff.
Again, not intentional i'm sure, but it is the responsibility of the company to make the details crystal clear prior to purchasing it. The solution is simple: add in a clearer description