Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 153
Ok so Geko said that the G-X was gonna get some stuff added and they were working on getting the Saucer Separation to work on it. Personally I could care less just want a fleet version with a few more tac options. But thought I make just a thread with what ppl want for a redone Gal-X.

My choices are

1. Make it 5 forward 3 rear weapons. Only twist being that the Lance is the 5th weapon and it can be changed to any damage type by buying special Lance weapon off Dilithium store or your fleet store. Still have the 3 min cooldown shot that is like a bo. This way you could get a version of the lance in any damage you want and have a mod that increases its accuracy.

2. A commander Tac esign tac with Lt com Engineer Lt engineer and lt science for stations.


3. Give the fleet version a 4th tac console.

3. Make the Cloak console an innate power. Only gets two cruiser commands so don't see that as being a big deal. Also would be killer since it's cloak is most likely based off a Romulan cloak that it would get the turn bonus like the Romulan warbirds do while cloaked.

Think those are my big three though as for number two I'd be happy with Com Engineer Lt commander Tac Lt Tac Lt Science and En engineer so it still has unique BO slots for the Fed side.

Just a thread for fun thoughts, doubtful the Devs will really take any ideas as Geko sounded like he had ideas of his own (not crazy bout a hanger but guess I'd use it if they stuck on on the G-X).
Survivor of Romulus
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,540
# 2
10-31-2013, 11:09 AM
1. Never going to happen, especially multiple damage types for the Lance. All Federation Energy weapons are Phasers. Quads, Aux Cannons, Lance, Beam Lotus, the Vesta Deflector thing. The Lance will always be built in.

2. Never going to happen, they want this to be an Engineering ship, most your going to get is a Universal somewhere.

3. This is actually highly likely to happen.

4. Never going to happen, and it's not going to grant the powers of a Romulan Battle Cloak. The Cloak will always be a Console and the Fleet version won't have it. Much like the Defiant you need the C-Store version to get the Cloaking Console.
I was once DKnight1000, apparently I had taken my own name so now I'm DKnight0001.
If I ask you a question it is not an insult but a genuine attempt to understand why.
When I insult you I won't be discreet about it, I will be precise and to the point stupid.
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,203
# 3
10-31-2013, 01:36 PM
I'd like to see a "standard beam firing mode" added to the fleet Gal-X phaser lance so that it can constantly shoot as portrayed in "All Good Things." Standard lance shot damage should be a little stronger than a Mk XII DBB (around 220 base DPS), but with only a 45-degree forward firing arc. However, it will work with standard beam related skills like FAW and Beam Overload. This effectively makes the spinal lance a 5th fixed forward beam weapon on the the front of the Gal-X instead of the current poor console power offering that it is now.

The above standard lance shot can co-exist with the present "Yamato-Cannon" lance firing mode on seperate cooldown timers, so those who use the Gal-X now need not worry about nerfs to their sniper-style tactics.

Last edited by shar487a; 10-31-2013 at 01:38 PM.
Captain
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 844
# 4
10-31-2013, 01:38 PM
Wow another gal x thread not predictable in the slightest :/

Why do the federation fan mob always want what the other races have

No fed cruiser will ever have a commander tac don't be ridiculous their strengths lie in commander eng if you can't see that then maybe you should play another game

No fed ship will or should ever have an innate cloak never mind a battle cloak

A hangar??? Where on earth or off earth are you living
----=====This is my opinion you don't have to listen and no one else has to read them these "OPINIONS" are based on my exploits and my learning other people will have their opinions and that's fine just don't knock my way of doing things thanks=====----
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 153
# 5
10-31-2013, 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustafatennick View Post
Wow another gal x thread not predictable in the slightest :/

Why do the federation fan mob always want what the other races have

No fed cruiser will ever have a commander tac don't be ridiculous their strengths lie in commander eng if you can't see that then maybe you should play another game

No fed ship will or should ever have an innate cloak never mind a battle cloak

A hangar??? Where on earth or off earth are you living

1. Balance of races maybe, cause everyone wants to have the cool toys. Pick one or the other don't matter to me.

2. Never say never and maybe in your eyes their strength lie there but to me I'd like to try something new and different. Considering we don't have one would be cool to have a cruiser with tac commander though I don't think it will happen as I said at bottom where I listed another Bo slot assignment I'd like.

3. Disagree with ya. Personally as both it and the defiant had one I think they should be innate course I think all tier 5 ships should keep their console slots and get the power from the console they currently come with. 3 piece sets would give a console so you can pick which ship you want and get the bonuses but would only have to use consoles from the other two ships.

4. The hanger I don't know maybe I heard it in a podcast where they said they had an idea to add a hanger. Maybe you should try listening to them instead of coming in here insulting ppl that heard their ideas.

Think you're in wrong thread. This is ideas we like to see whether they actually will happen or not. If you don't have any ideas there other G-X threads where you can complain so please move to one of them. It's simply put a thread or wishlist for just fun ideas ppl have about alterations done to a ship they meaning the devs said they were looking to upgrade before they release the Fleet version.

Last edited by darthconnor1701; 10-31-2013 at 03:11 PM.
Captain
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,156
# 6
10-31-2013, 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthconnor1701 View Post
1. Make it 5 forward 3 rear weapons. Only twist being that the Lance is the 5th weapon and it can be changed to any damage type by buying special Lance weapon off Dilithium store or your fleet store. Still have the 3 min cooldown shot that is like a bo. This way you could get a version of the lance in any damage you want and have a mod that increases its accuracy.
5 fore 3 rear might happen given that you're (supposedly) supposed to be using the lance, which is a spinal weapon, but the lance is always going to be built-in.

Quote:
2. A commander Tac esign tac with Lt com Engineer Lt engineer and lt science for stations.
Cruisers. Don't. Get. Commander. Tac. Period. And if you build it right you don't need it anyway.

Quote:
3. Give the fleet version a 4th tac console.
Might be doable.

Quote:
3. Make the Cloak console an innate power. Only gets two cruiser commands so don't see that as being a big deal. Also would be killer since it's cloak is most likely based off a Romulan cloak that it would get the turn bonus like the Romulan warbirds do while cloaked.
PLEASE do this.


And it doesn't need a hangar.
Capt. Kanril Eleya, U.S.S. Andraste, Strike Team Alpha

Useful Links for Foundry Writers | "Bait and Switch" -- Fed Foundry project, Part 1 rewards-qualified!
Say no to Arc! STO standalone installer
Commander
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 484
# 7
11-01-2013, 12:35 AM
I think I remember reading somewhere that the shuttlebay of the X was expanded to allow a fighter wing.

Personally, I'd be happy with a better lance and another console or two to start.
Weyland-Yutani Joint Space Venture - Always open to new members!

My name is Rage, and I too support a revised Galaxy family.
Quote:
Originally Posted by khayuung View Post
Firstly, be proud! You're part of the few, the stubborn, the Federation Dreadnought Captains.
Lieutenant
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 57
# 8
11-01-2013, 02:13 AM
it needs a ltC uni slot,4-5 tact consoles....5 forward weps,3 back....just like the avenger..it is a warship
..for all intense and purposes should be the rommy counterpart,crew hull size,etc...claok is meh, most ppl take it off anyway....
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 879
# 9
11-01-2013, 03:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mustafatennick View Post

No fed ship will or should ever have an innate cloak never mind a battle cloak

A hangar??? Where on earth or off earth are you living
before season 5, galaxy x and defiant have an integrated cloack, it was a ship abilitie that you aquired when buying the ship.
i don't remember about the defiant but the galaxy x got a third tact console slot for transforming the cloack into a console.
one would said it is an fair trade while i would question the fact that a tier 5 ship got only 8 console in the first place.
as usual with the galaxy x, unesplicable hold on it stats.


a hangar? indeed where on earth, correction, on universe are you living?
to my great dissapointement gecko mentioned it several time in the last podcast interview wich mean that he seriously thinking about adding one.
give me your transponding coordonate universe so i can see my future galaxy x without a hangar been added please.


http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...28931&page=271
Starfleet Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 879
# 10
11-01-2013, 03:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthconnor1701 View Post
1. Make it 5 forward 3 rear weapons.
that is in the spirit of the ship and would be gladly welcome.
it would also justify the name dreadnought and the only 2 cruiser command that we have.

Quote:
Only twist being that the Lance is the 5th weapon and it can be changed to any damage type by buying special Lance weapon off Dilithium store or your fleet store. Still have the 3 min cooldown shot that is like a bo. This way you could get a version of the lance in any damage you want and have a mod that increases its accuracy.
i have already loose my integrated cloack long time ago, can i please keep my integrated lance?
because if that happened you can be sure it will be at the expense of an other ship stats. not that i am against the idea to be able to switch weapons type, but trading a weapons slot for it is not a good idea and certainly not worth it.
for the record the galaxy x also have 1 weapons slot less in the back in the past and the lance was the justification, the dps that the lance provide is not worht the lost of a weapon slot, foward slot or back slot.

Quote:
2. A commander Tac esign tac with Lt com Engineer Lt engineer and lt science for stations.
meh, never happened. and if it would, what would be the price, would it be worth it?

Quote:
3. Give the fleet version a 4th tac console.
that is the logical step but you known, with the galaxy syndrome floating arround his head, this 10th console could really be ending in the engineering slot.
pray for this not to happened.

Quote:
3. Make the Cloak console an innate power. Only gets two cruiser commands so don't see that as being a big deal. Also would be killer since it's cloak is most likely based off a Romulan cloak that it would get the turn bonus like the Romulan warbirds do while cloaked.
yes for the return of the cloack as integrated, not a console.
cryptic seem to think that the cloack on the dreadnought was somekind of "favor" they give to the federation player.
hey!! wake up! the fact that the galaxy x got a cloack is CANON, why should we loose stats for having one, especially when it is JUST a regular cloack not a battle cloack.
if you don't want the federation to have cloack in the first place you shoudn't have bring the dreadnought into the game.
but you have, so now take your responsabilities.
i wonder how the klingons will react if we transform their cloack into a console, and what about the romulan?

it funny how the romulan cloack improved their general stats because it is integrated and allow them to cloack and hide at any time while been granted a huge bonus turn.
while we, galaxy x player must loose a console slot for something that only work in the beguining of the fight.
an other strike of the galaxy syndrome it seem.


http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/sh...28931&page=271
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22 PM.