Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 11
02-02-2010, 10:57 AM
/signed
I agree,especially when beaming into stations,just feels wrong.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 12
02-02-2010, 08:17 PM
shameless bump
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 13
02-03-2010, 12:09 AM
I don't know why cryptic hasn't done this yet!
You never see the crew beam down with weapons out. They always rip out their weapon right after they beam!
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 14
02-03-2010, 01:28 PM
Agreed sounds good!
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 15
02-03-2010, 02:07 PM
I agree with this suggestion. The first thing I do is hit 'H' to holster my weapon as soon as I beam anywhere.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 16
02-03-2010, 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakpar
Depends are they going into a hostile situation or are they going to a starbase. No one is going in with peaceful intentions when there are a bunch of Klingons holding federation scientists hostage. Though having a holster/unholster toggle would be nice. Maybe that is why Sulu always looks so nervous when i pay him a visit.
lol
It is kind of stupid ...
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 17
02-03-2010, 02:27 PM
I think when your asked to beam down, you should have a check box for with weapons draw. That way, if you want your weapons out on landing, they are.
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 18
02-03-2010, 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtkerry View Post
I think when your asked to beam down, you should have a check box for with weapons draw. That way, if you want your weapons out on landing, they are.
if it could remember my last choice... but I doubt they would clutter the npc window with checkboxes and such. also it makes sense to beam down on assault missions with weapons drawn. there were episodes where they beamed out with weapons drawn I think.

edit: also im guessing they would do this at some point but didn't have the time
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 19
02-03-2010, 07:17 PM
SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED

SIGNED


How many more signatures do we need?
Lt. Commander
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
# 20
02-07-2010, 11:14 AM
bump

+chars
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:31 PM.